Deficiency Index

Williamsburg Health & Rehabilitation Center

Williamsburg, Kentucky · CCN 185148

11 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
31
Surveys
11
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/11

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
125
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
SEKY HOLDING CO.
County
Whitley · rural
Medicare-certified since
1978

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
5
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Dec 10, 2025

334 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.993.59
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.85—
Annual nurse turnover38.2%45.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD787.5%E112.5%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 31 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Williamsburg Health & Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Dec 10, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to label and date food items in 2 (100 Unit and 300 Unit) of 3 unit refrigerators. This had the potential to affect all the residents who resided on 2 (100 Unit and 300 Unit) of 3 units in the facility.Findings included:An undated facility policy titled, Protocol for Foods Brought in From Family/Visitors, revealed, Policy: Recognizing that residents receiving foods brought in by family and friends has a positive association with their quality of life, we encourage family and friends to bring in items for their loved ones. Foods should be Checked In at Nurses' Station prior to delivering to the resident. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF600Dec 10, 2025

    Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a staff member for 1 (Resident #65) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for abuse.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation and Exploitation Policy, revised 07/2024, indicated, Our facility does not condone or tolerate resident abuse (this includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse and mental abuse), neglect, misappropriation or exploitation under any circumstances by anyone, including staff members, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff of other agencies serving or visiting the resident, family members, legal guardians, sponsors, friends, or other individuals. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF623Oct 24, 2024

    42440 Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide written notification of a facility-initiated transfer to the resident and responsible party (RP) and failed to provide documentation of ombudsman notification for three of three residents (Resident (R) 22, R27, and R68) reviewed for hospitalization out of 25 sample residents. The failure had the potential to affect the residents and/or their representatives' notification related to transfers. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF625Oct 24, 2024

    Based on record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide written notification regarding the facility policy for bed hold, which included the duration of the bed-hold and payment, if any, during which the resident was permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility for three of three residents (Resident (R) 68, R22, and R27) reviewed for hospitalization of 25 sample residents The failure had the potential to affect the residents and/or their representatives notification related to bed holds. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF636Oct 24, 2024

    Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure an Admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed within 14 days of admission for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident (R) 200). This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs due to the lack of a timely comprehensive assessment. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS [Minimum Data Set], revised July 2024, revealed .2. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 31 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 10, 2025Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Oct 24, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Jan 28, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 13, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Apr 19, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Jan 8, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Dec 5, 2013—2 findings
  • Nov 29, 2012—4 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
  • Feb 29, 2012—2 findings
  • Dec 16, 2011—5 findings
  • Sep 23, 2010—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction