Deficiency Index

White Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

Woodbury, New York · CCN 335690

13 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2025.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
72
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
200
Ownership
For profit - Partnership
Chain
Independent
County
Nassau
Medicare-certified since
1987

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 259 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New York.

Last survey on record

Nov 20, 2025

354 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.733.37
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.54—
Annual nurse turnover22.4%33.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,404 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG14.2%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2083.3%E—F14.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C28.3%
CMS’s current file: 24 of the 72 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6894×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F7262×

    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.

  • F5541×

    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

  • F6041×

    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

  • F6091×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at White Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Nov 20, 2025

    Based on observation, interviews and record review during an abbreviated survey conducted on 10/28/2025 for case number 2616775, the facility failed to ensure one (1) (Resident #1) of three (3) residents was free from accidents. Specifically, Certified Nursing Assistant #1 failed to follow the care plan for Resident #1 requiring a two-person assist. On 09/11/2025, Certified Nursing Assistant #1 transferred Resident #1 from their wheelchair to their bed alone resulting in a fractured left humerus (upper arm bone). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 8, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification initiated on 09/02/2025 and completed on 09/08/2025, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was identified during the Kitchen task observation on 09/02/2025 and during the Dining Task on 09/02/2025 at the lunch meal. Specifically, frozen food items (tiramisu, broccoli florets, pizza slices, a tray of diet pudding, regular pudding and peaches, roast beef, Brussel Sprouts) in the walk-in freezer were stored undated and or with opened packaging. Specifically, the facility did not monitor the temperature of cold food items (sandwiches, yogurt, milk) at the time of meal service. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF604Sep 8, 2025

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review during the Recertification Survey initiated on 09/02/2025 and completed on 09/08/2025, the facility did not ensure each resident had the right to be treated with respect and dignity, including the right to be free from any physical restraints imposed for the purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #36) of one (1) resident reviewed for Physical Restraints. Specifically, on 09/02/2025, Resident #36 was observed sleeping in a bed with the bed positioned between another empty bed on the right side and a Geri chair on the left side, thereby blocking the resident from getting out of the bed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Sep 8, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 09/02/2025 and completed on 09/08/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. This was identified for one (Resident #12) of five residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #12 was at risk for elopement and had a physician's order for a Wanderguard (a wearable bracelet for residents at risk for wandering, which causes an alarm when the resident approaches a restricted area). On 08/01/2025, the resident removed the Wanderguard; however, no new interventions were put in place to ensure the resident was appropriately supervised and did not remove the Wanderguard. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Sep 8, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey, initiated on 9/2/2025 and completed on 9/8/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident who required respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #129) of three (3) residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, Resident #129 did not receive pulse oximetry (oxygen saturation) monitoring (measures the oxygen saturation in blood) as recommended by the Physician in a progress note dated 09/01/2025; however, the Physician did not write an order for their recommendation. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 72 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 20, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 8, 2025Standard7 findings
  • Mar 9, 2024Standard11 findings
  • Apr 13, 2022Standard5 findings
  • Jun 28, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Feb 1, 2017Standard10 findings
  • Feb 3, 2016Standard8 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Feb 10, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Jan 24, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Feb 20, 2013—13 findings
  • Dec 30, 2011—3 findings
  • Dec 16, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction