Westwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Fort Walton Beach, Florida · CCN 105395
11 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 36
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- MAXIMUS HEALTHCARE GROUP
- County
- Okaloosa
- Medicare-certified since
- 1981
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=5, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Aug 6, 2026
95 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D5100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Westwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF584Aug 6, 2026
Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide maintenance services to maintain resident bedrooms in good repair for 1 of 11 sampled resident bedrooms. (room [ROOM NUMBER])The findings include:An observation of the wall near the window in room [ROOM NUMBER] was conducted on 8/3/26 at 3:01 PM. The wall was observed to be damaged and in disrepair. There was enough of a crack in the wall where the end on an ink pen could be inserted through the wall. Further observation of the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER] was conducted on 8/5/26 at 10:16 AM with the Maintenance Director. The Maintenance Director stated he was aware of the damage on the wall as the resident in the room had reported the damage to him about 2 weeks ago. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF688Aug 6, 2026
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain and prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 1 residents sampled for limited range of motion. (Resident #8) The findings include: The facility policy Prevention of Decline in Range of Motion (implemented 7/2/25) states, Residents who enter the facility without limited range of motion will not experience a reduction in range of motion unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that a reduction in range of motion is unavoidable. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Apr 25, 2025
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a comprehensive plan of care for 2 of 2 residents sampled for care plans. (Resident #21 and #24) The findings include: Resident #21 A record review of Resident #21's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that the resident is dependent on staff for activities for daily living. A review of the care plan developed by the facility for Resident #21 did not include an intervention to address the need for assistance in activities for daily living. On 4/23/2025 at approximately 1:00 PM, an interview was conducted with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDS) and Care Plan Coordinator. The Care Plan Coordinator confirmed that there was not a care plan for Resident #21 in regards to activities of daily living. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686Sep 21, 2022
Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff provide appropriate care and services to promote healing and prevent cross contamination of pressure ulcers for 1 of 1 sampled residents with pressure ulcers. (Resident #43) The findings include: A review of Resident #43's medical record was conducted which revealed she had a stage 3 pressure ulcer on her sacrum. An observation of wound care for Resident #43 was conducted on 9/20/2022 at 12:51 PM with Employee A (Licensed Practical Nurse). Employee A gathered supplies for the wound care from the treatment cart to include a bottle of wound cleanser dated 9/3/2022, took the supplies to the resident's room, and placed them on the over bed table with no barrier on the table. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Sep 21, 2022
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement safety precautions related to smoking to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 1 sampled residents who smoked tobacco products. (Resident #8) The findings include: An observation was conducted for Resident #8 on 9/19/2022 at 1:10 PM. The resident was outside on the smoking patio, which is located outside the dining room, smoking a cigarette. No staff were present on the patio at this time. He was observed to have his cigarettes and lighter in a plastic bag and lit his own cigarette. He was again observed to be smoking on the patio on 9/21/2022 at 8:50 AM with no staff present. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 36 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 6, 2026Standard2 findings
- Apr 25, 2025Standard1 finding
- Sep 21, 2022Standard2 findings
- Dec 12, 2019Standard3 findings
- Mar 16, 2018Standard7 findings
- May 25, 2017Standard5 findings
- Mar 17, 2016Standard2 findings
- Jun 26, 2014Standard and complaint6 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- May 17, 2013—1 finding
- May 16, 2013—5 findings
- Feb 10, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction