Westview of Derby Rehabilitation & Health Care Cen
Derby, Kansas · CCN 175218
31 surveys since 2010, 12 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 145
- Surveys
- 31
- Harm or worse
- 12
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 8
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 78
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- TUTERA SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE
- County
- Sedgwick
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 43 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Kansas.
Last survey on record
Sep 16, 2025
419 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.26 | 3.56 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.41 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 62.8% | 52.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $96,787 across 5 penalties
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J35.7% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G11.9% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3056.6% | E1222.6% | F713.2% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6897×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6983×
Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F6232×
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
- F6252×
Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Westview of Derby Rehabilitation & Health Care Cen, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689May 16, 2024
The facility reported a census of 65 with three of residents selected for reviewed for accident hazards. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and secure environment to prevent the elopement of cognitively impaired R1, identified at risk for elopement. On 05/07/24 at 09:40 AM a CNA M let R1 out the front doors of the building. CNA M thought R1 had an appointment and was leaving to get on the facility transport vehicle. When R1 went out the doors his WanderGuard caused an alarm to activate, and CNA M did not check which resident caused the alarm. The facility did not know R1 was not in the building until almost 15 minutes later when a staff member driving by the facility saw the resident outside, unsupervised, and notified the facility. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jan 10, 2024
The facility reported a census of 64 residents with three residents identified and reviewed for elopement. Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent cognitively impaired Resident (R)1, with a known history of elopement, from leaving the facility unsupervised and without staff knowledge on 12/31/23 at approximately 06:30 AM. The facility staff did not know R1 was not in the facility until the oncoming nurse, Licensed Nurse (LN) D, asked a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) G to locate R1. The facility staff could not locate R1 on 12/31/23 at 06:30 AM and LN D started the elopement process. At 07:30 AM, CNA G found R1 outside, at the back of the facility, at the bottom of the concrete stairs. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 26, 2023
The facility reported a census of 57 residents with three sampled for elopement. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a safe and secure environment for cognitively impaired Resident (R)1. On [DATE] at approximately 07:05 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) I walked in the front doors of the facility to report for her shift while R1 walked out of the front doors. LN I assumed R1 was a visitor or employee. The facility staff did not realize R1 was missing until 07:45 AM (40 minutes later), at which time the facility staff began searching for R1. Around 10:00 AM the family notified the facility R1 was found deceased by the train tracks at approximately 08:30 AM, after being struck by a train. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jan 11, 2023
The facility reported a census of 55 residents with 11 selected for review including three reviewed for risk of elopement (an incident in which a cognitively impaired resident with poor or impaired decision-making ability/safety awareness leaves the facility without the knowledge of staff). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for cognitively impaired and independently mobile Resident (R)2, who was identified as at risk of elopement, had a history of elopement, and the facility discontinued her elopement risk interventions. On 09/23/22, R2 exited the facility without staff awareness or supervision and crossed a heavily traveled four lane street. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 8, 2025
The facility reported a census of 43 residents with three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident remained free of accident hazards related to mechanical lift transfers when Resident (R) 1 obtained an injury on 11/15/24 at approximately 07:00 PM when an unknown staff member failed to safely operate the mechanical lift and transferred the resident without another staff member present. This deficient practice resulted in a fracture (broken bone) of R1's left patella (kneecap). […]
Read 31 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 31 of 145 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 16, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Mar 5, 2025Standard and complaint17 findings
- Jan 8, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- May 16, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 17, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jan 10, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 26, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 23 earlier surveys
- May 18, 2023Standard and complaint12 findings
- Jan 11, 2023Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 30, 2021Standard and complaint16 findings
- Dec 3, 2019Standard1 finding
- Sep 18, 2019Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 4, 2019Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 13, 2018Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Sep 11, 2018Standard5 findings
- May 1, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Dec 19, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Sep 26, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Feb 7, 2017Standard and complaint11 findings
- May 26, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Apr 8, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Mar 24, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Dec 1, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Jul 2, 2015Standard and complaint9 findings
- Mar 11, 2014Standard and complaint4 findings
- Dec 18, 2012—4 findings
- Aug 15, 2012—7 findings
- Nov 22, 2011—9 findings · 2 harm
- Jun 7, 2011—8 findings
- Dec 20, 2010—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction