Deficiency Index

Western MD Hospital Center

Hagerstown, Maryland · CCN 215110

17 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2014.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
109
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
13
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
11
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy11

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
63
Ownership
Government - State
Chain
Independent
County
Washington
Medicare-certified since
1977

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
3
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 33 facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Maryland.

Last survey on record

Dec 2, 2025

342 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day7.407.40
Registered-nurse hours per resident day3.15—
Annual nurse turnover19.4%19.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$24,060 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.7%K—L—
Actual harmG12.7%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2259.5%E410.8%F718.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B12.7%C12.7%
CMS’s current file: 37 of the 109 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6232×

    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Western MD Hospital Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF695Jun 4, 2024

    Based on review of medical records and facility investigation documentation and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards. This was found to be evident for one (Resident #40) out of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. This failure resulted in a determination on 5/31/24 at 9:45 AM of an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #40. The facility implemented effective and thorough corrective measures following this incident. The facility's plan and action were verified during this survey, therefore this deficiency will be cited as past noncompliance. The date of correction was 5/24/24. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF578Jun 4, 2024

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to 1.) to have a process in place to ensure that the resident's wishes for resuscitation were communicated to staff so that the staff would know immediately what action to take during an emergency. This resulted in harm to Resident #96, who had a do not resuscitate (DNR) order, receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The resident was resuscitated, remained at the hospital for 8 days, and returned to the facility with a chest tube inserted in each lung; 2.) reveal evidence that the resident was informed of their right to formulate an advanced directives by failing to document discussions regarding advanced directives and the outcome of the discussion in the resident's medical record and failed… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Dec 2, 2025

    Based on interviews it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified food service director. This was found to be evident for the one food service director and has the potential to affect all residents. On 11/20/25 the Food Service Director (FSD #13) confirmed that he is not a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The FSD reported he has taken the class and is eligible to take the exam but was not yet scheduled for the test. On 11/21/25 at 12:51 PM the FSD reported the facility has a dietitian (#11) who they consult and contact for guidance. On 11/21/25 at 12:51 PM interview with the dietitian revealed she works at the facility 20 hours per week conducting primarily clinical work such as nutritional assessments. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 2, 2025

    Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff identified when the automatic dishwasher was in need of maintenance and repair, and failed to ensure containers used for food preparation and service were stored in a sanitary manner. This was found to be evident during 3 out of 3 observations made in the kitchen during the survey and has the potential to affect all residents.The findings include: 1.On 11/19/25 at 8:45 AM surveyor started the initial tour of the kitchen. Dietary Clerk (#14) informed the surveyor that the Food Service Director was not working today and indicated she would get a supervisor. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF657Jun 4, 2024

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to review and revise resident care plans after each assessment. This was evident for 2 (Resident #13 and #6) of 24 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident, and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. […]

Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 109 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 2, 2025Standard7 findings
  • Jun 4, 2024Standard and complaint27 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 22, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 21, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • May 24, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Feb 14, 2018Standard5 findings
  • Nov 13, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 17, 2016Standard8 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Sep 1, 2015Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 26, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 26, 2014Standard1 finding
  • May 7, 2014Standard and complaint25 findings · 10 harm
  • Feb 21, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 26, 2013—3 findings
  • Mar 5, 2013—9 findings
  • Nov 17, 2011—6 findings
  • Aug 9, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction