West Ridge Specialty Care
Knoxville, Iowa · CCN 165308
37 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 70
- Surveys
- 37
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 78
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CARE INITIATIVES
- County
- Marion · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 43 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Iowa.
Last survey on record
Apr 23, 2026
200 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.10 | 4.05 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.86 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 53.2% | 41.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1076.9% | E323.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6581×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at West Ridge Specialty Care, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Nov 17, 2022
Based on observation, record review, and staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to obtain and clarify physician orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] #1). The failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy to the health, safety, and security of the residents. The facility also failed to implement appropriate interventions in a timely manner for Resident #1, and Resident #6, when significant changes of condition that included pain level rated at 10 out of 10 on a 0 to 10 pain scale, with 10 assigned to the highest level of pain, and circulation changes that included the development of worsened pitting [CONDITION(S)] that weeped fluid, did not implement appropriate interventions, and did not notify the physician of Resident #1's and Resident #6's condition changes or seek direction… […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 8, 2021
Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopements for 1 of 4 residents sampled (Resident #1) for falls. The Wander Guard system failed to sound on [DATE], allowing Resident #1 to exit the facility without staff knowledge. Despite knowledge of the wander guard system not alarming, the facility continued to use it as a means to alert staff when at risk residents breech an exit door. The facility failed to implement additional interventions to mitigate Resident #1's risk for elopement. On [DATE], the staff again discover Resident #1 outside unattended. The wander guard system failed to alarm. The nurse on duty failed to report the incident and no action taken to address the resident's risk for elopement. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF676Apr 23, 2026
Based on electronic record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide restorative programs as care planned for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for restorative care (Residents #2, #7, and #8). The facility reported a census of 71. Findings include: 1. Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed on 10/2/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. Diagnoses included a right femur (thigh bone) fracture, lack of coordination, history of falling, and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty speaking or understanding). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677Apr 23, 2026
Based on electronic record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide resident showers as scheduled for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Residents #1, #2, #4, #5, and #7). The facility reported a census of 71. Findings include: 1. Resident #3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed on 3/18/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The DMS included diagnoses of arthritis (joint inflammation), low back pain, malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition), and osteoporosis (brittle bones). The MDS noted the use of a motorized wheelchair for mobility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Nov 4, 2025
Based on clinical record review, staff interview, policy review, and resident interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to a dignified existence by failing to carry out perineal cares in a timely manner after incontinence episodes for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for incontinence care assistance (Resident #1) and for multiple, random residents affected, as reported by multiple staff members. The facility reported a census of 74 residents. Findings: 1. The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 10/24/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #1 which included hemiplegia(one-sided paralysis), anxiety, and depression. The MDS stated the resident was frequently incontinent with bowel and bladder and stated the resident was dependent on staff assistance for toileting hygiene. […]
Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 70 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 23, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Nov 4, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 30, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 14, 2024Complaint2 findings
- May 4, 2023Standard and complaint5 findings
- Jan 31, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Nov 17, 2022Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 17, 2022Complaint2 findings
Show the 29 earlier surveys
- Jul 22, 2021Standard and complaint2 findings
- Jun 8, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 17, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Jun 16, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Sep 12, 2019Standard1 finding
- Jun 13, 2019Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 31, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Oct 2, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jun 14, 2018Standard6 findings
- Apr 6, 2017Standard1 finding
- Mar 24, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Aug 18, 2016Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Mar 29, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Mar 17, 2016Standard1 finding
- Mar 2, 2016Complaint3 findings
- Apr 16, 2015Standard4 findings
- Jan 14, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Aug 18, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 28, 2014Complaint1 finding
- May 22, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 6, 2014—1 finding
- Jan 23, 2014—1 finding
- Dec 2, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 6, 2013—1 finding
- Jun 26, 2013—1 finding
- Dec 6, 2012—5 findings
- Mar 6, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 17, 2011—1 finding
- Apr 27, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction