Webster Health Services Nursing Facilty
Eupora, Mississippi · CCN 25A389
10 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 30
- Surveys
- 10
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 36
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Webster · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1998
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Aug 20, 2025
446 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.54 | 4.80 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.64 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 28.6% | 35.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $12,335 across 1 penalty
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G125.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D375.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Webster Health Services Nursing Facilty, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF700Jan 25, 2024
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident when bilateral side rails were applied to the middle of a residents' bed without assessing the resident for alternative safety methods, risk for entrapment, and failed to obtain informed consent prior to installation of bedrails for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed. Resident #6. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Side Rails, revised June 14, 2023, revealed Rationale: To provide guidelines for safe and effective use of bed rails in the patient care environment . An observation of Resident #6's room on 1/23/24 at 10:30 AM, revealed side rails in the up position bilaterally on each side of the bed. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Aug 20, 2025
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete section I (active diagnoses) and O (special treatments and programs) of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for four (4) of 14 sampled residents. Resident #6, #7, #29, and #34 Findings include: Review of facility letterhead revealed, (Proper name of facility) Long Term Care follows the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Regulatory Requirements. This was signed by the Administrator and dated 8/20/25. Resident #6 Record review of Resident #6's Order dated 6/26/25 revealed, Admit to Hospice. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF693Aug 20, 2025
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving enteral feeding received appropriate care for one (1) of two (2) residents with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube. Resident #20Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Enteral Feeding: Gastrostomy, PEG, Jejunostomy, unrevised, revealed under Policy: It is the policy of ‘Proper name of the facility' that residents unable or unwilling to ingest oral nutrients should be properly provided nutrition and care.During an observation of a medication pass on 8/20/2025 at 12:10 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, she checked placement of Resident #20's feeding tube and withdrew three and one-half (3 1/2) 60 ml (milliliter) syringes of… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Aug 20, 2025
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow infection prevention and control practices during blood glucose monitoring by not using a barrier and by cleaning the multiuse glucometer with an agent that was not effective against bloodborne pathogens for three (3) of eight (8) resident care opportunities observed. Resident # 8, Resident #22, and Resident #36Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled “Care of Equipment: Cleaning, Disinfecting, and Storage,” revised 1/10/24, revealed under “Cleaning and Disinfecting: Any equipment/devices entering the room or treatment area should be cleaned and disinfected between patient use with the approved disinfectant and according to the manufacturer’s instructions for use… […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 30 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 20, 2025Standard3 findings
- Jan 25, 2024Standard1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 16, 2020Standard5 findings
- Nov 2, 2017Standard2 findings
- Feb 2, 2017Standard2 findings
- Mar 9, 2016Standard4 findings
- Jun 13, 2014Standard1 finding
- Aug 16, 2013—6 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
- Sep 27, 2012—2 findings
- Dec 21, 2011—4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction