Waynesboro Post Acute & Rehabilitation
Waynesboro, Tennessee · CCN 445518
9 surveys since 2013. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 37
- Surveys
- 9
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 109
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- LYON HEALTHCARE
- County
- Wayne · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 2014
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=13, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Oct 22, 2025
383 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.53 | 4.35 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.47 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 26.1% | 49.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $8,788 across 1 penalty
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G746.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D640.0% | E16.7% | F16.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Waynesboro Post Acute & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF600Oct 22, 2025
Based on policy review, Hospice contract review, medical record review, facility investigation review, Hospital record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) sampled residents reviewed for injury of unknown origin. On 11/10/2022, Resident #1 was found in bed by staff with multiple bruises to her right shoulder and right upper arm. On 11/18/2022, Resident #1 complained of pain in her right shoulder area. On 11/18/2022, the facility obtained an X-ray of the right arm/shoulder that revealed a displaced acute right transverse humerus shaft fracture (broken upper right arm usually caused by trauma/injury). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF842Oct 22, 2025
Based on the policy review, Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Provider Transition Checklist memo review, Administrator's email, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain access and availability to resident's medical records for 10 of 10 (Resident #1, #3, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, and #12) sampled residents reviewed for medical records prior to 6/18/2024. The findings include: 1. Review of the RETENTION OF MEDICAL RECORDS, policy dated 10/1/2021, revealed .Medical records shall be retained by the facility in accordance with current applicable federal and state laws.Medical records of discharged residents will be retained for period required by State law.Six years from the date of discharge when there is no requirement in State law. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Jan 20, 2022
Based on policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately and securely when external medications and internal medications were stored together, and expired medications were in 4 of 7 medication storage areas (Treatment Cart, North Hall Medication Cart, West Hall Medication Cart, and West Hall Medication Room) reviewed and when 1 of 3 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1) gave the South Hall Medication Cart and Medication Room keys to the to an unauthorized staff member (the Housekeeping Supervisor) and left him unattended in the Medication Room. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Jul 1, 2026
Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide written information on how to formulate an Advance Directive for 13 of 24 (Residents #2, #7, #9, #10, #12, #19, #30, #35, #36, #42, #46, #48, and #55) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Advanced Directives, dated [DATE], revealed .Advance directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy.Advance Directive . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF695Jul 1, 2026
Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for the use of oxygen administration for 1 of 1 (Resident #36) residents reviewed for respiratory care. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy Oxygen Administration, dated 1/5/2025, revealed .The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration.Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure .Review the physician's orders.After completing the oxygen setup or adjustment, the following information should be recorded.The rate of oxygen flow. 2. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 37 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 1, 2026Standard6 findings
- Oct 22, 2025Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 20, 2022Standard3 findings
- Apr 2, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jun 27, 2018Standard8 findings · 6 harm
- Aug 27, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Apr 20, 2016Standard6 findings
- Mar 25, 2015Standard5 findings
Show the 1 earlier survey
- Nov 14, 2013Standard3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction