Deficiency Index

Waters of Greencastle, The

Greencastle, Indiana · CCN 155202

21 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
97
Surveys
21
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file16/21

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
100
Ownership
Government - Hospital district
Chain
INFINITY HEALTHCARE CONSULTING
County
Putnam · rural
Medicare-certified since
1981

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 32 government-run facilities of 100–127 beds in Indiana.

Last survey on record

Jun 18, 2026

144 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.393.61
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.32—
Annual nurse turnover44.6%47.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ14.2%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1770.8%E416.7%F28.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 24 of the 97 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5521×

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Waters of Greencastle, The, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 18, 2026

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to supervise and ensure the safety of a resident with dementia residing on the locked dementia unit when an exit glass door and an outside courtyard gate were left open by a contractor and the resident eloped from the facility and fell into a ditch for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident B). The immediate jeopardy began on 6/2/26 at 1:58 p.m., when Resident B was observed via video footage exiting the gate from the locked unit courtyard. She continued across the parking lot into a grassy field. She walked at a rapid pace, carrying a blanket in front of her. She walked approximately 100 yards and veered towards the road and was observed falling on her face in a ditch. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF835Jun 18, 2026

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) failed to communicate accurate information, complete accurate documentation, and pressured facility staff to provide false statements for an elopement from the memory care unit for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident B). This deficiency had the potential to affect 68 of 68 residents residing at the facility who were overseen by the Administrator and DON.Findings include:During an interview on 6/15/26 at 12:29 p.m., Resident B's spouse indicated he had been caring for his wife at home and was very sad he had to make the decision to place her in a safer environment due to her dementia. His wife was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 5, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure beard restraints were worn appropriately and hand hygiene was performed after staff touched their face during 5 of 5 kitchen observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 68 of 68 residents who ate meals from the kitchen. Findings include: 1. During a kitchen observation, on 12/1/25 at 10:05 a.m., [NAME] 7 was observed in the food preparation area, stirring a pot on the stove and preparing other food. At the same time, [NAME] 7 was observed with a full beard and mustache. [NAME] 7 had a beard restraint in place, but it only covered a small area of the beard on his chin, leaving the mustache and sides of the face open. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF552Dec 5, 2025

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain consent for treatment of psychotropic medications for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents 7, 8, 27, and 22). Findings include:1. On 12/3/25 at 10:25 a.m., the medical record of Resident 7 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. admission diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), hypertension (high blood pressure) and depression (an illness characterized by persistent sadness and a loss of interest in activities that you normally enjoy, accompanied by an inability to carry out daily activities, for at… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Dec 5, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the grievances expressed by the residents were addressed and resolutions were explained to the residents for 6 of 24 residents reviewed for food concerns (Residents 6, 71, 38, 24, 68, and 65). Findings include:During an interview, on 12/01/25 at 11:19 a.m., Resident 6 indicated she ate in her room. The food was often cold when she got it. The residents were not getting the food that was posted on the menus. The menu had not been right for a while. She was not sure who was ordering the food, but they frequently ran out of items. They recently had run out of coffee. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 97 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 18, 2026Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 5, 2025Standard9 findings
  • May 15, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 30, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Aug 15, 2023Standard9 findings
  • Mar 15, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 25, 2022Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Feb 23, 2021Infection control1 finding
Show the 13 earlier surveys
  • Oct 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 24, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 19, 2019Standard12 findings
  • Mar 4, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 24, 2018Standard14 findings
  • Aug 17, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Jun 16, 2016Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Sep 4, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Sep 25, 2014Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 2, 2013—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jan 30, 2013—5 findings
  • May 9, 2012—3 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 29, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction