Washington Veteran Home-Retsil
PT Orchard, Washington · CCN 505517
51 surveys since 2011, 12 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 187
- Surveys
- 51
- Harm or worse
- 12
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 240
- Ownership
- Government - State
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Kitsap
- Medicare-certified since
- 2007
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 35 facilities with 128 or more beds in Washington.
Last survey on record
Jul 20, 2026
112 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.88 | 4.69 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.91 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 45.1% | 35.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $23,920 across 1 penalty
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G11.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4066.7% | E1830.0% | F11.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6895×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F6584×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F6774×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F6103×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6413×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Washington Veteran Home-Retsil, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 2, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow manufacturer's guidelines during the use of a mechanical lift and the lift sling for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1, 5) reviewed for falls. The facility failed to assess, evaluate the root cause, and implement fall prevention interventions specific to resident needs for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4) reviewed for accidents. In addition, the facility failed to follow manufacturer instructions for routine, documented inspection of the mechanical lift slings. Resident 1 experienced harm when they sustained a hip fracture when transferred with a mechanical lift and sling in a manner inconsistent with the manufacturer instructions. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 30, 2023
Based on interview and record review, facility failed to ensure the care plan for safe transfers with a mechanical lift was followed for one of three residents (Resident 1) and failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 2) was assessed for safe transfer with a mechanical lift after sustaining a head injury during a fall. Failure to follow the care plan for safe transfers caused harm to Resident 1 when he fell and fractured his lower leg during a transfer performed without the use of the mechanical lift. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 12, 2022
Based on interview and record review, facility failed to ensure care planned interventions to prevent falls for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for avoidable falls were implemented and failed to ensure staff were oriented to facility policy regarding use of transfer gait belts (belts used around resident's waist for support during a transfer from one surface to another). Failure to follow care planned interventions and orient staff for transferring resident with a gait belt resulted in harm to Resident 1 who sustained a femur (thigh bone) fracture and endured severe pain. Facility Policy, Equipment- Transfer/Gait Belt, dated 09/17/2008, documented staff were to use a gait belt for resident transfers that did not involve the use of a mechanical lift. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF725Apr 22, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff were available to provide care and services as evidenced by information provided in Resident/Surveyor interviews for 7 residents (Residents 84, 389, 14, 6, 41, 184 & 67) interviewed, and 9 staff (Staff Q, R, J, K, L, M, N, O & P) interviewed. The facility had insufficient staff to ensure residents received assistance with restorative services, meal tray delivery times, and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including showers and shaving. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF882Mar 25, 2022
Based on staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure they employed a designated Infection Preventionist (IP) with specialized training. This failure had the potential to affect all the residents residing in the facility. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy regarding the employment of a dedicated IP were requested. The survey team was provided with the Long-term Care Guidance to Surveyors F-Tag F882 (Infection Preventionist) document which read, in pertinent part, The facility must designate one or more individuals as the infection preventionist(s) (IP)(s) who are responsible for the facility's IPCP. The IP must: Completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. […]
Read 31 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 31 of 187 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 20, 2026Complaint1 finding
- May 11, 2026Standard15 findings
- Apr 7, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jul 11, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jul 2, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 28, 2025Standard15 findings
- Mar 14, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Dec 20, 2024Complaint2 findings
Show the 43 earlier surveys
- Jul 12, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Apr 22, 2024Standard and complaint16 findings
- Mar 8, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Nov 9, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Sep 14, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jun 23, 2023Standard7 findings
- Jun 1, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jan 30, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 5, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Oct 10, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Oct 3, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jul 27, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 2, 2022Complaint1 finding
- May 12, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 25, 2022Standard11 findings
- Aug 31, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Jul 14, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Oct 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jan 16, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Jan 7, 2020Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 10, 2019Standard and complaint17 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 21, 2019Complaint7 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 11, 2018Standard15 findings
- May 11, 2017Standard7 findings
- Jan 30, 2017Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 25, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Apr 26, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Apr 21, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 4, 2016Standard3 findings
- Jan 12, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Oct 19, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Sep 14, 2015Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 14, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Feb 11, 2015Standard4 findings
- Jul 25, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jun 18, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 11, 2014Standard4 findings
- Feb 4, 2014—1 finding
- Mar 1, 2013—2 findings
- Apr 20, 2012—1 finding
- Mar 20, 2012—7 findings
- Jun 3, 2011—1 finding
- Mar 1, 2011—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction