Deficiency Index

Warroad Care Center

Warroad, Minnesota · CCN 245329

29 surveys since 2011, 11 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
180
Surveys
29
Harm or worse
11
Immediate jeopardy
6
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy6

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/29

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
49
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Roseau · rural
Medicare-certified since
1986

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
4
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 123 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Minnesota.

Last survey on record

Dec 18, 2025

326 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.004.22
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.84—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$190,547 across 6 penalties
Payment denials
3
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ48.0%K—L—
Actual harmG12.0%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2244.0%E36.0%F1734.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C36.0%
CMS’s current file: 50 of the 180 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6104×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6093×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Warroad Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, patternF812Aug 13, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure unpasteurized shell eggs were fully cooked and prepared in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation for 1 of 1 residents (R20) who was observed to consume undercooked unpasteurized eggs; 9 of 9 residents (R3, R5, R6, R16, R24, R33, R44, R45, R46) who were identified to frequently request and consume undercooked unpasteurized eggs on a routine basis. The IJ that began on 8/11/21, when the facility prepared and served unpasteurized egg(s) on a made to order basis with runny yolk(s), which were not fully cooked resulting in an increased potential for foodborne illness. On 8/11/21, at 4:47 p.m. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Nov 6, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R39) with a known history of sexual behaviors towards others was comprehensively assessed and interventions implemented to mitigate risk to prevent ongoing sexual abuse for 2 of 2 residents (R31, R6) who were cognitively impaired, dependent on staff for their care, and were sexually abused by R39. The immediate jeopardy (IJ) began on 9/6/24, when R39 came up behind R31 and fondled her breasts. The facility failed to comprehensively assess and develop interventions to help manage and reduce the risk of injury or assault to others. This contributed to R39 continued episodes of sexual abuse toward R31 on 9/25/24, and again on 10/14/25, and toward R6 on 10/15/24. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Nov 6, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff were following care planned interventions of two staff assist when transferring residents with a ceiling lift; and failed to complete therapy/or nursing assessments to determine the appropriate sling sizes per manufacturers guidelines for 3 of 4 residents (R12, R7, R2) reviewed who were transferred via ceiling lifts. These deficient practices resulted in immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R12, R7 and R2 who were at risk of serious injury as a result of the deficient practice. The IJ began on 10/29/24, when R7 was observed to be transferred in the ceiling lift from her bed to the toilet by assist of one staff when R7 was care planned to be transferred with two staff. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF803Jun 13, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to provide the physician ordered mechanically altered diet for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed who was at risk for choking and served the wrong textured diet. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1. The IJ began on 5/28/24, when R1 was served a regular diet instead of the physician ordered pureed diet which resulted in R1 choking and requiring the Heimlich Maneuver to dislodge a corn dog. The administrator was notified of the IJ on 6/12/24, at 3:21 p.m. The IJ was removed on 6/13/24, at 1:15 p.m., but noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity level D, with no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 8, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to maintain resident safety when a resident with a history of exiting the facility unsupervised, eloped through the Assisted Living (AL) wing of the facility at approximately 4:15 a.m. on 8/22/23. This resulted in an immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation for R1. In addition, the facility failed to implement a system to ensure proper functioning of their Wander Alert system resulting in 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for elopement, exiting the unit unnoticed by staff during the survey. The IJ began on 8/22/23, when R1 exited the facility via the attached AL wing of the facility after staff left her unattended in the lobby for the second time during the overnight shift at 4:15 a.m. R1 was not located again until 4:45 a.m. […]

Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 180 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 18, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Dec 4, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 27, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 6, 2024Standard and complaint27 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 17, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 13, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 6, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 29, 2023Standard4 findings
Show the 21 earlier surveys
  • Nov 22, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 8, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 19, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • May 25, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 4, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 27, 2022Standard and complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 13, 2021Standard5 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 29, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 23, 2019Standard7 findings
  • Dec 13, 2018Standard14 findings
  • Jun 14, 2018Standard16 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 24, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 3, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Jun 2, 2016Standard5 findings
  • May 13, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 28, 2014Standard9 findings
  • Sep 19, 2013Standard16 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 27, 2012—16 findings
  • Jun 10, 2011—18 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 10, 2011—6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction