Deficiency Index

Warren Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing

Queensbury, New York · CCN 335549

26 surveys since 2010, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
144
Surveys
26
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/26

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
80
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
CENTERS HEALTH CARE
County
Warren
Medicare-certified since
1976

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
1
Staffing
1
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 49 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in New York.

Last survey on record

Apr 15, 2026

208 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.273.27
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.50—
Annual nurse turnover71.1%53.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$9,318 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG12.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2158.3%E1438.9%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 36 of the 144 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Warren Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Mar 14, 2023

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review during an abbreviated survey (Case #NY00310764), the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, on 2/12/2023, the facility failed to provide Resident #1, who was cognitively impaired, with adequate supervision to prevent an elopement. Subsequently, Resident #1 was able to exit the building through the front door, which was alarmed, and exited the facility for approximately two hours. Did not discover the resident was missing until the resident's Power of Attorney called the facility to alert them that the resident was at their previous house. Review of resident's address on google maps revealed the resident house was approximately 5.2 miles North of the facility. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600May 31, 2024

    Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case # NY00331618), the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aide #1 did not follow Resident #3's care plan which included that the resident required physical assistance from two nursing staff to safely complete bed mobility. On 1/15/2024, Certified Nurse Aide #1 attempted to roll the resident while they were in bed without assistance from another nursing staff member. Subsequently, the resident fell on to the floor and sustained fractures to both of their legs. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Sep 26, 2022

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case #NY 302), the facility did not ensure the resident has the right to be free from physical abuse for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that Certified Nursing Assistant #1 (CNA) did not enter Resident #1's room after Resident #1 and their resident representative had stated to the Registered Nurse Manager (RNM) during a meeting on 9/2/2022 that they did not want CNA #1 near or providing care to them. On 9/15/2022, CNA #1 entered Resident #1's room, a verbal altercation occurred between CNA #1 and Resident #1, and CNA #1 physically assaulted Resident #1 by pushing their hands forcefully into both of the resident's eyes. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Apr 15, 2026

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the survey, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for three (3) (Resident #'s 6,# 10 and #52) of twenty-three (23) residents reviewed. Specifically, (a.) Resident #6 was placed in their room in the active dying phase without staff contact or interventions. (b.) Resident #10 was observed using a bedside commode without privacy curtain closed; and (c.) Resident #52 asked to use the bathroom and was told to soil their brief because staff had no time to toilet them.Findings include: The Facility's Policy Titled Resident Rights, revised 5/28/2024, documented Federal and State laws guarantee… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF561Apr 15, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure residents were able to exercise the right to self-determination, including making choices regarding daily routines, meals, and living environment, for two (2) (Resident #9, Resident #47, and Resident #71) of three (3) residents reviewed for choices. Specifically, (a.) Resident #9 was not permitted to return to bed upon request and was not provided with meaningful meal choices; and (b.) Resident #47 was expected to have moved from their room without consent despite refusal. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights, revised 05/28/2024, documented healthcare personnel shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 144 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 15, 2026Standard and complaint21 findings
  • Jul 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 31, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 6, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Mar 27, 2023Complaint5 findings
  • Mar 14, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 26, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 15, 2021Standard and complaint14 findings
Show the 18 earlier surveys
  • Jan 29, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 27, 2019Standard15 findings
  • Sep 26, 2019Standard15 findings
  • Sep 26, 2018Standard9 findings
  • Jan 31, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 11, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 24, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Nov 21, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 11, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 15, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Nov 10, 2014Standard2 findings
  • May 1, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 20, 2013—5 findings
  • Apr 19, 2013—3 findings
  • Jan 15, 2013—8 findings
  • Dec 20, 2011Standard11 findings · 1 harm
  • Feb 8, 2011—4 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 23, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction