Deficiency Index

Wake Robin-Linden Nursing Home

Shelburne, Vermont · CCN 475056

6 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
12
Surveys
6
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file4/6

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
33
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Chittenden
Medicare-certified since
1998

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
5
Staffing
1
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jan 21, 2026

292 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Annual nurse turnover58.5%47.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD150.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C150.0%
CMS’s current file: 2 of the 12 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Wake Robin-Linden Nursing Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Jan 21, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of fourteen sampled residents (Resident #6) medical record clearly communicated the resident's choice of code status to staff responsible for the resident's care. Findings include:Per record review, Resident #6 has a COLST (Clinician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) dated [DATE] which states Resident #6 is a DNR (do not resuscitate) and that CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, an emergency technique to restart breathing) should not be attempted, but that s/he might have a natural death. The Resident does not want to be intubated or ventilated, and s/he wishes treatment needed for comfort. Patient prefers no transfer to hospital for life-sustaining treatments. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF678Jun 22, 2022

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to have appropriate policies directing staff when to initiate basic life support by not ensuring documentation of a resident and their representative's choice to have emergency basic life support immediately when needed for one of twelve sampled residents (Resident #2). Findings include: Per review of Resident #2's physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The facility policy CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) states: In the event of a cardiac or pulmonary arrest, Wake [NAME] provides CPR according to physician orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Jun 22, 2022

    Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident allergies were consistently identified throughout the resident's medical record for one of three residents sampled (Resident #6). Findings include: Per record review Resident #6's Physicians Orders lists allergies of raw apples, raw pitted fruit, and Aleve. These allergies are also listed in the resident's medication administration record. Per the Guidelines for Daily Care (tool used to inform Licensed Nursing Assistants (LNAs) of each resident's specific care needs) lists Allergies as Raw Apples, Raw Pitted Fruits, Aleve Review of Resident #6's care plan date 4/11/2022 reflects that she/he may need an epi [[MEDICATION(S)]] pen may have life threatening allergic reaction to peanuts and hazelnuts or pitted… […]

  • No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadF730Aug 2, 2023

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a performance review at least once every 12 months for every Licensed Nurse Assistant (LNA) and then must provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for 5 of 5 LNA's in the sample. Findings include: During review of a random selection of 5 employee personnel files, 5 of 5 LNA files reviewed did not have evidence of annual performance review within the last 12 months. Per interview on 8/1/23 at 11:00AM, the Administrator confirmed that the facility had not conducted the required performance reviews for the LNA's.

Read all 12 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 21, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Aug 2, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Jun 22, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Dec 17, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • May 21, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Mar 23, 2011—6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction