Vista del Sol Care Center
Los Angeles, California · CCN 555849
30 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 186
- Surveys
- 30
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 50
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Los Angeles
- Medicare-certified since
- 2008
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.
Last survey on record
May 1, 2026
192 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.87 | 4.36 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.44 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 33.3% | 36.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $110,124 across 1 penalty
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G23.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4370.5% | E1524.6% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B11.6% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6094×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6563×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6953×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F8423×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F5502×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Vista del Sol Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Mar 25, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents, (Resident 9), who was at risk for dehydration (lack of drinking sufficient fluids to meet the body's need) and malnutrition (food ingested [eaten]) does not provide enough nutrients or the right balance for optimal health), was offered sufficient food and did not experience unplanned severe weight (wt) loss (a body weight loss of greater than five [5] percent [% - unit of measure] in one month). The facility failed to: 1. Identify interventions related to Resident 9's poor food intake since admission to prevent progressive wt loss. 2. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF695Mar 25, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory treatment and care for one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 13), who had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems) and history of pneumonia (a serious infection of one or both lungs in which the air sacs fill with pus and other liquid). The facility failed to: 1. Closely monitor Resident 13's respiratory condition, including response to treatment after being identified to have a change of condition (COC, a sudden clinically important deviation from a patient's baseline) when Resident 13 develop a cough on 3/20/2024. 2. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 17, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) identified as a high risk for fall from repeated falls by failing to: 1. Identify and evaluate hazard(s) and risk(s) related to the resident's specific risk and causes to prevent further falls and injuries. 2. Implement an intervention to address the nature of category of falling in which the resident fell . Resident 1 fell from the wheelchair in the three incidents of falls. 3. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 11, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one to one supervision monitoring (a sitter), and to ensure that the care plan reflected the actual assessment for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1), who was identified as high risk for fall and have had multiple falls on 2/26/2023 and 3/8/2023. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a right eyebrow laceration (a deep cut or tear in skin or flesh) on 2/26/2023, where Resident 1 was transferred to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for a physical examination, a Computed Tomography (CT, a medical imaging scan used to obtain detailed internal images of the body) of the brain and spine, and laceration repair. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF837May 17, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Administrator (Administrator 1) spent sufficient amount of time in the facility to perform his responsibilities as indicated the facility ' s policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Plan and the facility ' s Job Description for an Administrator as evidenced by: 1. 8 of 8 sampled facility staff Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs 1 and 2), Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs 1, 2 and 3), the Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA), Director of Nursing (DON), and Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) indicated it had been a while (from 1 to 5 months) since they last saw Administrator 1 in the facility. 2. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 186 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 1, 2026Standard16 findings
- Nov 14, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Sep 16, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jun 23, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 10, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Feb 16, 2025Standard and complaint11 findings
- Oct 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 25, 2024Standard25 findings · 2 harm
Show the 22 earlier surveys
- Jan 10, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Nov 18, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Nov 17, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 17, 2023Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 11, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Mar 16, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 22, 2022Infection control2 findings
- Mar 29, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Feb 6, 2022Standard27 findings
- Dec 28, 2021Complaint1 finding
- May 17, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Oct 7, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Sep 10, 2019Standard7 findings
- Aug 23, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Apr 8, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Oct 8, 2018Standard7 findings
- Oct 12, 2017Standard11 findings
- Oct 18, 2016Standard21 findings
- Aug 23, 2015Standard12 findings
- May 18, 2014Standard4 findings
- Jan 27, 2013—11 findings
- Nov 6, 2011—9 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction