Deficiency Index

Vasona Creek Healthcare Center

Los Gatos, California · CCN 055798

75 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
202
Surveys
75
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file41/75

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
148
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
PACS GROUP
County
Santa Clara
Medicare-certified since
1980

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
3
Staffing
1
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 225 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jun 2, 2026

160 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.714.08
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.33—
Annual nurse turnover54.0%37.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD6782.7%E911.1%F11.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B44.9%C—
CMS’s current file: 81 of the 202 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F68413×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6587×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F8806×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F7614×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8424×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Vasona Creek Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Nov 22, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: 1. A used face shield was stored on top of the receptionist desk; 2. A barrel containing soiled linen was overflowing; 3. There was an uncovered garbage bin near the yellow zone (observation unit); 4. Resident 30's room had an unlabeled tube feeding syringe, and resident's urinary tubing and bag were on the floor; 5. Resident 376's urinal and water pitcher were stored together and a used under pad was on the floor; 6. A cup of tea was on top of the medication cart; 7. Garbage bin outside room K was overflowing; 8. Laundry staff did not wear an apron or gown while transporting soiled linen; 9. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Nov 25, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment orders for respiratory [breathing] therapy (RT, treatment that helps individuals optimize their respiratory function, breathe more easily, and live more comfortably) was carried out as ordered for six out of six residents (Residents 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9). The failure had the potential for the residents not attaining their highest practicable physical well-being, such as not being able to attend activities or carry out the activities of daily living (ADLs; such as eating, toileting, dressing, personal hygiene, etc.) due to reduced respiratory functions. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 5's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including history of COVD-19. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Oct 3, 2024

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for 13 of 28 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13) when there were multiple days for which there was no evidence of documentation that scheduled treatments were provided. This failure had the potential to compromise the residents' health, safety, and overall well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 1's physician order dated 5/15/24 indicated he had an order for, [NAME] external paste (topical cream used to aid in wound healing) 40 %, apply to bilateral buttocks topically every shift. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Aug 26, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided for three of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) when there were multiple days for which there was no documentation that chest percussion therapy (treatment that involves using cupped hands to tap the area over the resident's lungs to help clear secretions) was provided as ordered. This had the potential to compromise the residents' health and well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including pulmonary fibrosis (a condition in which the lungs become scarred) and emphysema (a condition in which damage to the air sacs in the lungs cause breathing difficulty). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Mar 13, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Licensed nurses did not administer a medication because it was not available in the facility; 2. The facility did not receive lab results (blood test results) and did not follow up with the lab regarding these results; 3. The facility did not administer Boost High Protein (a nutritional drink) as indicated in the admission orders; 4. Licensed nurses did not carry out an admission order for Pedialyte (a solution used to replace fluids and minerals in the body) until five days after admission; 5. The facility did not update wound treatments as ordered; and 6. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 202 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 19, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 2, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 27, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 26, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 11, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 20, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 17, 2025Complaint1 finding
Show the 67 earlier surveys
  • Feb 10, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 27, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 4, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 25, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 31, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Oct 3, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 19, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 18, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 13, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 30, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 24, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 13, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 9, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 11, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 11, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 7, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 15, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 12, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 29, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 12, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • May 1, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 3, 2023Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 6, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 19, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 1, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 5, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 2, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 22, 2021Standard17 findings
  • Aug 18, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 30, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 18, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 2, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Nov 2, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 21, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 30, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 10, 2019Standard14 findings
  • Feb 21, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 8, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 31, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 23, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 19, 2018Standard9 findings
  • Jun 27, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 6, 2017Standard16 findings
  • Oct 7, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 6, 2016Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 18, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 17, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • May 22, 2015Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Apr 20, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 25, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Jun 10, 2013—8 findings
  • Jan 2, 2013—1 finding
  • Sep 28, 2012—1 finding
  • Jul 9, 2012—6 findings
  • Jun 15, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 22, 2012—1 finding
  • Aug 5, 2011—13 findings
  • Feb 3, 2011—1 finding
  • Jan 12, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction