Deficiency Index

Valley Vue Care Center

Armstrong, Iowa · CCN 165353

12 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2022.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
36
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
40
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
LEGACY HEALTHCARE
County
Emmet · rural
Medicare-certified since
1997

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=14, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 12, 2026

242 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.863.63
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.74—
Annual nurse turnover35.0%44.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD11100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 11 of the 36 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Valley Vue Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Dec 27, 2022

    Based on observations, clinical record review, resident representative interview, staff interviews, facility policy, and facility record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #133 and #25). The significant medication errors resulted in hospitalization s. The facility failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy to the health, safety, and security of the residents. The facility also failed to ensure the right dose of a medication was administered for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for administration of medications, (Resident #13). The facility also failed to ensure documentation of narcotic medication was completed according to accepted standards of practice. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF760Mar 12, 2026

    Based on record review, manufacturer's guidelines and staff interview, the facility failed to assure residents insulin pen was primed prior to insulin administration preventing a significant medication error for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 32 residents.Findings include:During an ongoing observation on 3/11/2026 starting at 11:04 a.m., of Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) preparing to check Resident #12's blood sugar prior to meal and administer insulin. Staff A checked the insulin orders and did not perform hand hygiene prior to applying gloves. Staff A removed the insulin pen from the medication cart and an insulin pen needle. Staff A turned the dial to 2 units without the insulin pen needle on it and pushed the trigger. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Mar 12, 2026

    Based on observation, infection control policy and staff interview, the facility failed perform proper hand hygiene and adhere to infection control guidelines during medication pass for 1 of 4 residents observed (Resident #12) The facility reported a total census of 32 residents.Findings include: During an ongoing observation on 3/11/2026 starting at 11:04 a.m., of Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) preparing to check Resident #12's blood sugar prior to meal. Staff A removed items needed for blood sugar check. Staff A without performing hand hygiene applied gloves. With gloves on locked the medication cart, knocked on the residents door, opened the door to the residents room, picked up the barrier and placed the barrier onto the bed and placed supplies on the barrier. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Feb 13, 2025

    Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to complete and document appropriate assessments and interventions for the necessary care and services, to maintain the residents' highest practical physical well-being for 2 of 13 residents reviewed (Resident #8 and #17). The facility failed to obtain and complete a treatment order for Resident #8's open area to the right buttocks. The facility also failed to complete neurological assessments after an unwitnessed fall and failed to document urinary assessment after suspecting a urinary tract infection after the fall for Resident #17. The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF690Feb 13, 2025

    Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #12 and #31). The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS identified Resident #12 was dependent on staff with transfer to the toilet and toileting hygiene. The MDS indicated that Resident #12 has an indwelling catheter. Resident #12's MDS included diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident (CVA), benign prostatic hyperplasia, neurogenic bladder (bladder dysfunction caused by nervous system conditions) and retention of urine. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 36 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 12, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Feb 13, 2025Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Feb 29, 2024Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Dec 27, 2022Standard and complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 19, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Nov 21, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Sep 20, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Apr 28, 2016Standard5 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Jun 11, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Mar 27, 2014Standard and complaint3 findings
  • Jan 13, 2012—2 findings
  • Apr 1, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction