Deficiency Index

Valle Verde Health Facility

Santa Barbara, California · CCN 055733

26 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
82
Surveys
26
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse3

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/26

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
80
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
HUMANGOOD
County
Santa Barbara
Medicare-certified since
1972

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 21 not-for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jun 29, 2026

133 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.794.82
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.61—
Annual nurse turnover25.7%28.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG14.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2087.0%E—F28.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 82 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6563×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F7613×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8422×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Valle Verde Health Facility, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Jun 29, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of an unstageable (a severe wound where the true depth and extent of tissue damage cannot be determined because the wound bed is completely obscured by dead tissue) pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue) in one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with a left ankle-foot orthosis boot (AFO - a medical brace designed to support the ankle) status post-surgery and was found with an unstageable pressure ulcer on the left foot approximately 6 weeks later. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Jan 10, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service when the Director of Food and Nutrition Services (referred to as Director of Dining Services (DDS)), albeit was a full time (FT) position, DDS was responsible for not only the main kitchen that provided foodservice for the residents residing in the Health Center (skilled nursing facility), but also responsible for two other foodservice operations located on the Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) campus, community Meals on Wheels, and providing food for another contracted small health facility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 10, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service when: 1. TCS foods (Time Temperature Control for Safety - food that requires time-temperature control to prevent the growth of bacteria) were not consistently and accurately cooled down to ensure food safety. 2. The ice machine, located in a pantry near a nursing station, utilized for residents was not maintained in a sanitary condition. 3. There were unsanitary conditions in the main kitchen related to: 3a. Kitchen floors with build -up of dried food debris. 3b. Floor drains with build- up of dried food debris. 3c. Clean equipment stored on unclean shelves. 4. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Jan 9, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment -a medical document that translates treatment preferences into actionable medical orders) was signed by the Responsible Party (RP- one who has authority to make healthcare decisions) for one of 4 sampled residents (Resident 14).This failure had the potential to result in Resident 14's wishes regarding medical treatment not being followed.Findings:During a review of Resident 14's POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment [a medical document that translates treatment preferences into actionable medical orders]), dated 11/10/25, Resident 14 signed the POLST consenting to DNR (Do Not Attempt Resuscitation), Selective Treatment - goal of treating medical… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Jan 9, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:1.Develop a care plan and interventions for hearing impairment for one of two sampled residents (Resident 8). This failure had the potential for Resident 8's hearing impairment to worsen and thus impact the resident's quality of life.2.Implement care plan interventions for Resident 11 related to access to call light and repositioning in bed. This failure had the potential for Resident 11 not to receive the necessary care needed. 1.During a record review of Resident 8's comprehensive assessment, dated 12/04/25, this indicated Resident 8 was assessed to have hearing impairment.During an observation on 01/07/26 at10:55 a.m. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 82 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 29, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 9, 2026Standard5 findings
  • Jan 10, 2025Standard5 findings
  • Oct 21, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 27, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 16, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 1, 2023Standard7 findings
Show the 18 earlier surveys
  • Oct 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 25, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 12, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 4, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 10, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 24, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 25, 2019Standard4 findings
  • May 16, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 25, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Jul 27, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Apr 10, 2017Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 4, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Jul 28, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 26, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Jun 9, 2014Standard and complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 20, 2013—5 findings
  • Aug 29, 2012—9 findings
  • Sep 2, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction