Deficiency Index

Upland Rehabilitation and Care Center

Upland, California · CCN 055374

44 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
145
Surveys
44
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file33/44

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
206
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
THE ENSIGN GROUP
County
San Bernardino
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 225 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in California.

Last survey on record

Sep 22, 2025

413 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.324.08
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.46—
Annual nurse turnover35.0%37.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2990.6%E13.1%F26.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 32 of the 145 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6845×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F8422×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Upland Rehabilitation and Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 6, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary practices were maintained in the kitchen when: 1. Three (3) of three (3) ice machines had a black unknown substance in the ice chute (area between where ice is formed and where it enters the ice bin) which put 133 residents, who used or ingested ice from this machine, at risk for foodborne illness (illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food). 2. Three (3) sinks in the kitchen and one of three (3) ice machines (ice machine 1) did not have an air gap (which had the potential for back flow from the sewer to enter the ice machine and the sinks). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 9, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety when employees' food was found inside 1 of 3 residents' refrigerators (Station 1 RR). This failure had the potential to expose 50 highly susceptible residents from Station 1, who were on an oral diet, to cross-contaminated (the transfer of harmful substances or disease- causing microorganisms) food. Findings: During a review of the facility's Station 1 Daily Census, dated May 4, 2025, the census indicated there were 56 residents in Station 1. During a review of the Station 1 Dietary Order Tally Report, (undated), the Dietary Order Tally Report indicated there were six residents who were not receiving an oral diet. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF676Sep 22, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living services were provided for one of three residents (Resident 1) in accordance with facility policy when, Resident 1 was not provided with a restorative nursing assistance (RNA) exercise for walking. This failure had the potential to cause a decline in a clinically compromised resident (Resident 1) health and ability to walk. Findings: During a review of Resident 1' admission Record (general demographics) on September 8, 2025, the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, type 2 diabetes (a condition in which the body have more sugar in the blood), hypertension (a condition in with a high blood pressure) and… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550May 9, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat one of three sampled residents (Resident 398) with dignity when Certified Nurse Assistant 3 (CNA 3) was standing over the resident while assisting during lunch. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the self-esteem and self-worth of Resident 398. Findings: During a review of Resident 398's Admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 398 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unstable angina (a type of chest pain or discomfort caused by reduced blood flow to the heart muscle), atherosclerosis (a condition where plaque builds up inside the arteries, causing them to narrow and potentially harden), hypertension (high blood pressure), and diabetes (a disorder… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578May 9, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the right to formulate an Advance Directive (a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) for five of 37 sampled residents (Residents 50, 147, 153, 175, and 497) when: 1. The Advance Directives Checklist forms did not indicate whether Residents 50, 147, and 153 were provided an opportunity to formulate an Advance Directive. 2. Resident 175's Advance Directives Checklist form was not followed up to ensure their responsible party was given the opportunity to complete an Advance Directive on behalf of the resident. 3. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 145 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 22, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 9, 2025Standard15 findings
  • Oct 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 20, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 2, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 27, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 36 earlier surveys
  • Aug 16, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 16, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • May 6, 2022Standard6 findings
  • Feb 8, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 1, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 30, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 31, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 30, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • May 17, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 2, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 12, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 9, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Nov 28, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 1, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 27, 2018Standard19 findings
  • May 11, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 15, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 19, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 10, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Oct 10, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 23, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Mar 2, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 16, 2015Standard6 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 3, 2014Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 13, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Dec 6, 2013—4 findings
  • Jan 11, 2013—10 findings
  • Dec 27, 2012—1 finding
  • Jul 9, 2012—1 finding
  • Jul 3, 2012—2 findings
  • Jun 6, 2012—1 finding
  • Feb 21, 2012—15 findings
  • Feb 18, 2011—14 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction