United Methodist Communities at Collingswood
Collingswood, New Jersey · CCN 315404
12 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 32
- Surveys
- 12
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Camden
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Nov 26, 2025
348 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.51 | 4.91 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.43 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 36.8% | 30.3% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D466.7% | E233.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at United Methodist Communities at Collingswood, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Aug 19, 2024
Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete by not documenting the completion of treatments for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 42) reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/13/24 at 10:56 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #42 sitting outside his/her room in a wheelchair. The resident had a wander guard (a device that alarms if the resident attempts to exit the facility) on his/her left wrist. According to the Admission Record, Resident #42 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia and mood disorder. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Aug 19, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the potential spread of infection and cross-contamination to both residents and staff by failing to: adhere to proper handwashing techniques, clean and sanitize medical equipment in accordance with the facility policy and manufacturer's recommendation and maintain appropriate infection control practices during the medication administration observation for 1 of 2 nurses observed on 1 of 3 nursing units ([NAME] Unit). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/14/24 at 8:20 AM, the surveyor met with Registered Nurse (RN) #2 at the medication cart. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF644Nov 26, 2025
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to conduct a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level one assessment after a resident was newly diagnosed with a mental illness. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASRR (Resident #2) and was evidenced by the following:On 11/20/2025 at 12:10 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #2 Electronic Medical Record (EMR) which showed that the resident had a PASRR completed on entry to the facility. Under section one for diagnoses of mental illness it was marked as NO, meaning Resident #2 did not have any mental illness diagnoses when admitted . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Nov 26, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined the facility failed to revise an individual comprehensive care plan for a resident with a repeated fall history. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #12) and was evidenced by the following: On 11/19/2025 at 10:24 AM, during the initial tour of the facility the surveyor observed Resident #12 in bed with eyes closed. The resident's bed was in the lowest position and there was a fall mat on the right side of the bed.A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected Resident #12 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to depression, low back pain, anxiety, hypertension, and repeated… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Nov 26, 2025
Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff for transfers was safely and properly transferred with two staff members via mechanical lift. Instead, the resident was transferred using mechanical lift by one staff member from their chair to their bed. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #29) reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following: On 11/20/25 at 10:30 AM, Resident #29 was observed in the bed and had just received care from the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). The surveyor observed the resident had soft padding on the right and left upper side rails of the bed. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 32 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 26, 2025Standard and complaint3 findings
- Aug 19, 2024Standard3 findings
- Oct 14, 2020Standard1 finding
- May 3, 2019Standard3 findings
- Jun 28, 2018Standard1 finding
- Apr 28, 2017Standard1 finding
- Jun 24, 2016Standard3 findings
- Jun 23, 2014Standard2 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
- Jul 3, 2013—3 findings
- Sep 6, 2012—10 findings
- Aug 19, 2011—1 finding
- May 19, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction