Deficiency Index

Uintah Basin Rehabilitation and Senior Villa

Roosevelt, Utah · CCN 465084

10 surveys since 2011, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
82
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse7

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file8/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
90
Ownership
Government - County
Chain
Independent
County
Duchesne · rural
Medicare-certified since
1981

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=7, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Apr 16, 2026

207 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.233.40
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.89—
Annual nurse turnover46.4%41.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD342.9%E342.9%F114.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 7 of the 82 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Uintah Basin Rehabilitation and Senior Villa, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 15, 2021

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility did not store, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, meal tray items were uncovered when delivered by staff and uncovered meal tray items were placed at nurses' stations for extended periods; snacks with packaging that read Keep Refrigerated were stored at room temperature; food within the kitchen fridge and freezer were observed unlabeled and left open to air; food was stored at ground level in the walk-in refrigerator; and kitchen staff were unable to demonstrate an ability to check the concentration of sanitizer within sanitation buckets and the dish washing machine. Findings included: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Jul 15, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 5 of 27 sampled residents, the facility assessment did not accurately reflect the resident's status. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that all participants in the assessment process had the requisite knowledge to complete an accurate assessment for resident's documented with limited range of motion, a resident documented with nutritional concerns, and a resident documented with wandering behaviors. Resident identifiers: 3, 13, 15, 23, and 30. Findings include: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Jul 15, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs. Specifically, for 4 of 27 sampled residents, following witnessed and unwitnessed falls the facility did not maintain and update the comprehensive care plan to include the services that were to be furnished. Resident identifiers: 1, 3, 13, and 23. Findings included: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . On 7/12/21 at 1:25 PM, resident 1 was interviewed. Resident 1 stated, I fell last week. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Jul 15, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 3 of 27 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, residents that had multiple falls were not provided interventions or adequate supervision to prevent falls from occurring. Resident identifiers: 3, 13, and 23. Findings include: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF628Apr 16, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility did ensure a written notification of discharge was provided to a resident. Specifically, a resident who was transported to the hospital, and subsequently discharged from the facility, did not receive a written notice of discharge.On April 15, 2026, the surveyor reviewed Resident 2's electronic medical record and confirmed she was sent to the emergency room and discharged from the facility on September 26, 2026. No notice of discharge was present in the record. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 82 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 15, 2021Standard6 findings
  • Nov 13, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 6, 2019Standard12 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 5, 2018Standard19 findings · 3 harm
  • Dec 8, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Sep 16, 2015Standard5 findings
  • Jul 17, 2014Standard4 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Jun 5, 2013—9 findings
  • Sep 15, 2011—16 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction