Timber Springs Rehab and Retirement
Springhill, Louisiana · CCN 195353
20 surveys since 2011, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 93
- Surveys
- 20
- Harm or worse
- 6
- Immediate jeopardy
- 6
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 153
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PRIORITY MANAGEMENT
- County
- Webster · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 98 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Louisiana.
Last survey on record
Mar 25, 2026
229 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.14 | 3.53 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.20 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D541.7% | E758.3% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Timber Springs Rehab and Retirement, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF689Dec 8, 2022
Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #3) of 20 (#3, #5, #37, #41, #11, #9, #152, #39, #10, #14, #102, #44, #19, #42, #29, #34, #21, #1, #46, #12) residents reviewed for impaired cognition and/or a diagnosis that may increase their risk of elopement was adequately supervised to prevent elopement from the facility. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #3 on 08/21/2022 at 2:48 a.m. when Resident #3 exited from the facility unsupervised and was found across the street from the facility in front of the police station. Resident #3 had a diagnosis of Schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease and has severe cognitive impairment with a history of confusion and escalating psychotic behaviors. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF835Dec 8, 2022
Based on interviews, the facility failed to administer its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident #3 was adequately supervised to prevent repeated elopements from the facility 2. Complete incident reports, investigations, and train staff on supervision of residents to prevent elopements 3. Ensure Resident #3 was reassessed for elopement risk and update his plan of care with additional interventions to prevent repeat elopements. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #3 on 08/21/2022 at 2:48 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF644Mar 25, 2026
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a newly diagnosed mental disorder to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASARR evaluation and determination for 1 ( #5) of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings:A review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/27/2015 with a diagnosis of Generalized Anxiety Disorder on 11/05/2020. Further review revealed Resident #5 was not referred to the appropriate state-designated authority for a Level II PASARR evaluation.During an interview on 03/25/2026 at 2:00 p.m., S3 Social Services acknowledged a Level II PASARR evaluation was not completed for Resident #5 after new diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder.During an interview on 03/25/2026 at 2:30 p.m., S3… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Jan 15, 2025
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed for 1 (#50) of 26 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure an activities care plan had been developed with interventions for Resident #50. Findings: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an initial admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included, in part, anxiety disorder, essential (primary) hypertension, and depression. Review of Resident #50's 12/02/2024 Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) revealed Resident #50 had a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 15, which indicated Resident #50 was cognitively intact. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700Jan 15, 2025
Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure correct use and maintenance of bed rails for 7 (#1, #4, #24, #25, #42, #48, #49) of 7 (#1, #4, #24, #25, #42, #48, #49) residents reviewed for the use of bed rails. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Residents #1, #4, #24, #25, #42, #48, and #49 were assessed for the risk of entrapment prior to the use of bed rails, less restrictive approaches were attempted prior to the use of bed rails, ongoing assessments for the risk of entrapment were conducted after bed rail installation, and residents were care planned with specific interventions for the use of bed rails, and; 2. Bed rails were securely attached to the bed for resident # 4, and #25. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 93 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Mar 25, 2026Standard2 findings
- Jan 15, 2025Standard5 findings
- Dec 6, 2023Standard4 findings
- Sep 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 8, 2022Standard5 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 5, 2022Standard and complaint3 findings
- Jan 23, 2020Standard5 findings
- Apr 16, 2019Complaint1 finding
Show the 12 earlier surveys
- Dec 14, 2018Standard5 findings
- Jan 26, 2018Standard5 findings
- Dec 13, 2017Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Jan 12, 2017Standard3 findings
- Mar 12, 2015Standard1 finding
- Feb 28, 2014Standard5 findings
- Mar 7, 2013—4 findings
- Dec 19, 2012—1 finding
- Oct 11, 2012—2 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 19, 2012—8 findings
- Jul 27, 2011—23 findings
- May 26, 2011—7 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Hilltop Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterPineville2 harm findings
- Capitol House Nursing and Rehab CenterBaton Rougeno harm findings
- Sterling Place Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterBaton Rouge2 harm findings
- Meadowview Health & Rehab CenterMinden1 harm finding
- Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation WinnsboroWinnsboro4 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction