Deficiency Index

The Villages at Southern Hills

Tulsa, Oklahoma · CCN 375546

19 surveys since 2012, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
36
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
4
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2012–2023
’12’15’20’23
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file17/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
STONEGATE SENIOR LIVING
County
Tulsa
Medicare-certified since
2011

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Nov 8, 2023

1,097 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.063.68
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.35—
Annual nurse turnover51.8%54.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD133.3%E266.7%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 36 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Villages at Southern Hills, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Aug 26, 2022

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a [MEDICATION(S)] injection (an anticoagulant medication) was available for one (#158) of 12 residents observed during medication pass. The DON identified five residents who were prescribed [MEDICATION(S)]. Findings: A facility policy titled, Disposal of Medications, Syringes and Needles, dated December 2012, read in parts, .Discontinued medications and/or medications left in the nursing care center after a resident's discharge, which do not qualify for return to the pharmacy, are identified and removed from current medication supply in a timely manner for disposition . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Aug 26, 2022

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications and treatments were properly stored/secured for one (100 hall) of six medication carts observed and two of two treatment carts observed. The DON identified the facility had seven medication carts and two treatment carts. Findings: A facility policy titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated September 2018, read in parts, .During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse .The cart must be clearly visible to the personnel administering medications when unlocked . On 08/23/22 at 10:30 a.m., a medication cart was observed to be unlocked/unsecured on the 100 hall. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jul 21, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to: a. ensure staff wore face masks according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines to prevent the development and transmission of COVID-19; and b. ensure COVID-19 screening was completed upon entry and exit to the facility per policy. The administrator identified 107 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: CDC (Centers for Disease Control) guidance, updated on 04/06/21, titled Improve the Fit and Filtration of Your Mask to Reduce the Spread of COVID-19, .Correct and consistent mask use is a critical step everyone can take to reduce their risk of getting and spreading COVID-19 .Masks should a) Completely cover the nose and mouth. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Nov 8, 2023

    Surveyor: [NAME], [NAME] Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with MASD received necessary treatment and services that were consistent with the standards of practice for one (#256) of two residents reviewed for skin conditions. The DON identified 20 residents with MASD resided in the facility. Findings: The Non-Pressure Wounds: Moisture Associated Dermatitis Clinical Operations policy, dated July 2018, read in parts, .Review and investigate the type and frequency in which the areas managed for prevention and treatments .Briefs used and frequency of changing briefs .Review orders and treatments and gather supplies .Report abnormalities to supervisor . […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 36 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 8, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Aug 26, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Jul 21, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Jul 29, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Jun 10, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 21, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 18, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 22, 2017Complaint1 finding
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • May 25, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 2, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 12, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Feb 17, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 8, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 24, 2014—6 findings
  • Apr 18, 2013—1 finding
  • Nov 8, 2012—1 finding
  • Aug 3, 2012—3 findings
  • May 11, 2012—4 findings · 4 harm
  • Apr 20, 2012—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction