The Village at Heritage Oaks
Corsicana, Texas · CCN 675581
11 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2022.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 21
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 107
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Navarro · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=12, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Dec 11, 2025
333 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.38 | 3.25 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.28 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D120.0% | E360.0% | F120.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The Village at Heritage Oaks, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Dec 1, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident was free from any significant medication errors for (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed. This facility failed to administer insulin medication for (Resident #1) according to the doctor's order. Resident #1 was administered a long- acting insulin (released over time), the resident should have been administered short acting insulin (taken daily before meals). This failure could place residents at risk of jeopardizing their health by not receiving medications as ordered. The noncompliance was identified as PNC (Past non-compliance). The non-compliance began on [DATE] and ended on [DATE]. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF868Jul 26, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility's Medical Director attended the QAA/QAPI Committee meetings, for 3 of 3 quarterly meetings ( July, August, September 2022, October, November, December 2022 and January,February, March 2023), reviewed for QAA/QAPI. The facility failed to ensure the Medical Director attended their QAA and QAPI meetings for the months of July 2022 through March 2023. This failure could place residents at risk for quality deficiencies being unidentified and no appropriate plans of actions developed or implemented, and no appropriate guidance developed. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF583Dec 11, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident has a right to secure and confidential personal and clinical records for 15 (Resident #1, Resident # 2, Resident #3, #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #14 and Resident #15) out of 15 residents on 200 Hall of the facility. A. The personal health information of 15 residents was left unlocked and displayed on the charting kiosk's screen on the hallway wall by CNA L. This failure could result in fifteen residents' personal information being exposed to unauthorized individuals. The findings included:Observation on 12/09/2025 at 9:35 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Sep 18, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for hall 300, 400 and room [ROOM NUMBER]. The facility failed to ensure the carpet in the hallway between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 304, was in good repair. The facility failed to ensure the carpet in the doorway to room [ROOM NUMBER] was in good repair. The facility failed to ensure the flooring in the doorway into room [ROOM NUMBER] was in good repair. The facility failed to ensure the flooring on 400 hallway was kept in good repair. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF925Sep 18, 2024
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for four of four halls (Halls 100, 200, 300, and 400) and the nurse's station, conference room, lobby, and main dining room reviewed for pest control program. The facility had live flies and gnats in areas of the facility including the nurse's station, Halls 100, 200, 300, 400, nurse's station, conference room, lobby, and the main dining room. This failure could place residents at risk for spread of infection, cross-contamination, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: An observation on 09/16/24 at 9:00 a.m., revealed in the front lobby there were three gnats flying around the front door. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 21 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 11, 2025Standard1 finding
- Mar 23, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Sep 18, 2024Standard2 findings
- Jul 26, 2023Standard1 finding
- Dec 1, 2022Infection control1 finding · 1 harm
- May 6, 2022Standard6 findings
- Dec 14, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 12, 2020Standard2 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- Nov 30, 2018Standard and complaint2 findings
- Oct 19, 2017Standard3 findings
- Nov 10, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction