Deficiency Index

The Springs of Fairfield Bay

Fairfield Bay, Arkansas · CCN 045153

23 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
75
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
55
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
THE SPRINGS ARKANSAS
County
Van Buren · rural
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=19, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 16, 2026

116 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.863.77
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.51—
Annual nurse turnover63.6%62.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD18.3%E975.0%F18.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C18.3%
CMS’s current file: 12 of the 75 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Springs of Fairfield Bay, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 6, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that (1) Food stored in the walk-in cooler, walk in freezer, dry storage area, and storage area shelves along a back wall were labeled with a receive date and sealed to prevent food borne illness for one out of one kitchen, (2) expired food items were promptly discarded on or before the expiration date to prevent the growth of bacteria, (3) cross contamination did not occur during lunch service by touching the surface area of the plate, touching food inside a scoop, and touching the inside of the bowl, and hands were washed properly after donning/doffing gloves. 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 8, 2022

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the refrigerator were covered and sealed; dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment, cold dairy products were maintained at a temperature at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F); and hot foods were maintained at or above 135 degrees F on the steam table while awaiting service to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen and expired food items were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date to prevent the growth of bacteria. These failed practices had the potential to affect 36 residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census:36 ), as documented on a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 18, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff used a alcohol wipe to cleanse the thermometer between food items when acquiring the temperatures on the steam table prior to lunch service to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. This failed practice had the potential to affect 30 residents who received their meals the kitchen. The findings are: 1. On 06/15/21 at 11:34 AM and 11:37 AM, during steam table temperature observation, Dietary Employee #1 wiped the thermometer with her gloved hand instead of an alcohol wipe which was on the counter next to her. 2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF600Jul 16, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to protect four (Resident #1, Resident #9, Resident #10, and Resident #12) of eight residents reviewed for abuse allegations from sexual abuse behavior by another resident. The findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised on 04/01/2021, revealed the facility must Protect residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of property by anyone including, but not limited to: Facility staff Other residents Consultants Volunteers Staff from other agencies Family members Legal representatives Friends Visitors and/or Any other individual. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF609Jul 16, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to report alleged allegations of resident-to-resident sexual abuse for four (Resident #1, Resident #9, Resident #10, and Resident #12) of eight residents reviewed for abuse allegations. The findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised on 04/01/2021, revealed the facility must Investigate and report any allegations within timeframes required by federal requirements. The Abuse Policy did not address sexual abuse. There was no definition, training for recognition of sign and symptoms, or interventions to prevent sexual abuse. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 75 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 16, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 26, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Sep 6, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Oct 6, 2023Standard1 finding
  • Jul 8, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Jun 18, 2021Standard5 findings
  • Jun 18, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Feb 21, 2020Standard and complaint8 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Feb 22, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Dec 20, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 20, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Feb 24, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Dec 8, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 8, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Jun 4, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Apr 18, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Nov 22, 2013—1 finding
  • Jul 12, 2013—2 findings
  • Jun 13, 2012—3 findings
  • Mar 15, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 28, 2011—2 findings
  • Sep 8, 2011—1 finding
  • May 27, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction