Deficiency Index

The Springs of Barrow

Little Rock, Arkansas · CCN 045432

71 surveys since 2010, 29 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
320
Surveys
71
Harm or worse
29
Immediate jeopardy
18
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy18

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file66/71

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
139
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
THE SPRINGS ARKANSAS
County
Pulaski
Medicare-certified since
2010

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 46 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Arkansas.

Last survey on record

Mar 5, 2026

249 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.063.82
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.33—
Annual nurse turnover74.8%49.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1055.6%E738.9%F15.6%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 18 of the 320 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5781×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F5801×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F5841×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Springs of Barrow, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, widespreadF908Feb 9, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the cooking range in 1 of 1 kitchen was kept in safe operating condition to prevent injury to staff and residents. This failed practice resulted in Immediate Jeopardy, which caused or was likely to cause serious harm, injury or death for all 58 residents, as documented on the Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form provided by the Administrator on 02/01/2021 at 11:24 A.M., as well as staff and visitors. The Administrator was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy condition on 02/09/2021 at 1:40 P.M. The findings are: 1. On 02/02/2021 at 10:54 A.M., Dietary Employee #1 took a paper towel and twisted it, she then walked over to the gas stove and turned the knob for the right front burner. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 12, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and faculty policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands and changed gloves when contaminated; the ice machine was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition; opened food items in the refrigerator and freezer were sealed or covered to maintain freshness and prevent potential cross-contamination; expired dressing products were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date to prevent the growth of bacteria; cold beverages were held at 41 degrees Fahrenheit to maintain the quality of food items and beverages. The findings are: 1. On [DATE] at 9:28 AM, Dietary Aide (DA) #1 picked up his phone and placed it in his pocket, contaminating his hands. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 30, 2023

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the freezer were sealed and dated, staff clothes did not touch food while serving food and staff wore hair net or cap to confine hair while in food preparation areas to minimize the potential for contaminating food items for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 74 residents who received meals from the kitchen as documented on the List provided by the Administrator on 1/30/23. The findings are: 1. On 1/30/23 at 11:55 AM., the Regional Dietary Consultant provided a policy that documented .Manual: Food and Nutrition Services .Issued 9/1/2021 . Standard: All employees wear approved attire for the performance of their duties. Guidelines: 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 9, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items, the robo coupe was cleaned and dried between uses, and failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment for food preparation to prevent the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The failed practices had the ability to affect 80 residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen according to a list provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 09/08/22 at 2:00 PM The findings are: 1. On 9/26/22 at 10:15 AM, the deep fryer had food debris and oil on the front and top of the machine. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 4, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the freezer were covered and sealed to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; and dietary staff washed their hands between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential for cross contamination and food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The failed practices had the potential to affect 73 residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census:76), as documented on a list provided by Administrator on 3/2/2022. The findings are: 1. On 02/28/22 at 11:27 AM, the following observations were made in the walk-in freezer: a. […]

Read 49 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 49 of 320 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 5, 2026Standard2 findings
  • Jan 8, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • Sep 12, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Nov 3, 2023Standard7 findings
  • Aug 4, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 28, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 13, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Jan 30, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 63 earlier surveys
  • Nov 2, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 9, 2022Standard8 findings
  • May 24, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 4, 2022Standard9 findings
  • Nov 24, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 13, 2021Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Feb 9, 2021Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 4, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 22, 2020Infection control2 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 11, 2020Complaint5 findings
  • Aug 7, 2020Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 19, 2020Infection control3 findings
  • Apr 3, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 6, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 23, 2019Standard and complaint16 findings
  • Jun 27, 2019Complaint4 findings
  • Apr 25, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 5, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 11, 2018Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 31, 2018Standard and complaint26 findings
  • May 3, 2018Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 16, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 15, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Dec 15, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Oct 21, 2016Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • May 26, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Mar 31, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 22, 2016Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 21, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 6, 2015Standard5 findings
  • Aug 28, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 15, 2015Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 29, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 2, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Jan 29, 2015Standard and complaint8 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 4, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 14, 2014Complaint5 findings
  • Jun 6, 2014Complaint6 findings
  • May 2, 2014Complaint6 findings
  • Apr 18, 2014Complaint6 findings
  • Mar 31, 2014Complaint6 findings
  • Mar 12, 2014Standard and complaint24 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 7, 2014—1 finding
  • Nov 7, 2013—1 finding
  • Sep 13, 2013—11 findings
  • Aug 9, 2013—3 findings
  • Jul 11, 2013—2 findings
  • Jun 14, 2013—8 findings
  • May 10, 2013—7 findings
  • Feb 13, 2013—2 findings
  • Nov 21, 2012—4 findings · 3 harm
  • May 15, 2012—1 finding
  • Apr 20, 2012—15 findings
  • Nov 7, 2011—5 findings · 4 harm
  • Aug 11, 2011—1 finding
  • Jul 29, 2011—7 findings
  • Jun 7, 2011—5 findings · 3 harm
  • May 11, 2011—1 finding
  • Apr 8, 2011—1 finding
  • Feb 24, 2011—2 findings
  • Feb 4, 2011—1 finding
  • Dec 29, 2010—5 findings · 3 harm
  • Nov 4, 2010—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction