Deficiency Index

The Oaks Care Center

Pineville, Louisiana · CCN 195529

28 surveys since 2010, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
92
Surveys
28
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
6
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy6

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file25/28

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
136
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
PLANTATION MANAGEMENT COMPANY
County
Rapides
Medicare-certified since
2001

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
4
Staffing
1
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 98 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Louisiana.

Last survey on record

Jan 7, 2026

306 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.253.53
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.17—
Annual nurse turnover49.5%48.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD964.3%E535.7%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 14 of the 92 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F8032×

    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5611×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Oaks Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 10, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use a mechanical lift and two person physical assistance during a transfer from the wheelchair to bed, as specified in the resident's person centered comprehensive plan of care, for 1(#96) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents (#10, #76, #71 and #96), out of total sample of 33. This failed practice resulted in an actual harm situation on 07/18/2022 at 6:00 p.m., when Resident #96, who required a mechanical lift and two-person physical assistance for transfers, was transferred from the wheelchair to bed by S4CNA without using the mechanical lift and assistance of another staff member. Resident #96 hit her left lower leg on her wheelchair during the transfer, causing a laceration that measured 30cm in length. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF809Apr 4, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure that Residents meals were distributed in a timely manner. This deficient practice had the potential to effect all Residents that are served meals in the dining room. Findings: A review of the Facility's Frequency of Meal policy read in part . 1. Meal service times for the Residents are as follows: a. Breakfast 7:15 a.m. b. Lunch 11:30 a.m. c. Dinner 5:15 p.m. An Interview on 04/03/2023 at 7:38 a.m. with Resident #3 revealed he was sitting in dining room awaiting breakfast. Resident #3 stated that he typically eats most meals in the dining room and at times has to wait for long periods of time to receive meals. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Aug 26, 2021

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent and control the spread of COVID - 19. The facility failed to discontinue indoor church services during a facility outbreak, and failed to ensure a delivery driver was screened before entering the facility, and wore a mask while onsite. This had the potential to affect all 110 residents in the facility. Findings: Interview with S1 Administrator on 08/25/2021 at 8:45 a.m. revealed he stated the facility did have residents who tested positive for COVID-19 residing on the facility's COVID-19 designated unit. He stated the facility also had staff who tested positive for COVID-19 and were currently off work on quarantine. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jan 7, 2026

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infection by failing to ensure staff sanitized reusable medical equipment between each resident use, and performed hand hygiene after direct resident contact. Findings: Review of facility policy on 01/06/2026 at 1:30 p.m. titled Hand Hygiene Policy and Procedure dated 07/01/2020 revealed in part.Policy: Hand Hygiene shall be performed: (3) Before and after direct resident contact for which hand hygiene is indicated by acceptable professional practice. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Sep 18, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to residents according to accepted standards of clinical practice for 2 (Resident #97 and Resident #102) out of a total sample of 30 residents. The facility failed to notify the physician when: 1. Resident #102 had blood glucose levels greater than 451 mg/dL as ordered. 2. Resident #97 had an unwitnessed fall. Findings: Review of a facility policy titled Change in Condition Policy and Procedure dated 08/27/2018 revealed in part . Procedure: 2. The licensed nurse will assess the resident and note any signs and symptoms, including physical and mental changes in condition. Assessment may include but is not limited to: physical assessment findings, vital signs, blood glucose, oxygen saturation, etc. […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 92 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 7, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Sep 18, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Aug 24, 2023Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Apr 4, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 10, 2022Standard and complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 26, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • May 13, 2019Complaint6 findings
  • Aug 23, 2018Standard3 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
  • Sep 15, 2017Complaint6 findings
  • Aug 24, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Jan 4, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 22, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Nov 24, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 3, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Jul 7, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 30, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 9, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 6, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Sep 10, 2014Complaint4 findings
  • Sep 12, 2013—5 findings
  • Mar 28, 2013—2 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 13, 2013—4 findings
  • Feb 20, 2013—2 findings
  • Jan 29, 2013—2 findings
  • Dec 15, 2011—9 findings
  • Nov 3, 2011Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 14, 2011—1 finding
  • Oct 21, 2010—7 findings · 6 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction