Deficiency Index

The NM Behavioral Health Institute at Las Vegas

Las Vegas, New Mexico · CCN 325104

24 surveys since 2011, 18 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
145
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
18
Immediate jeopardy
6
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy6

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
162
Ownership
Government - State
Chain
Independent
County
San Miguel · rural
Medicare-certified since
1995

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 68 facilities in New Mexico.

Last survey on record

Dec 12, 2025

332 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.086.02
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.63—
Annual nurse turnover25.4%33.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$18,353 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG13.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1142.3%E1038.5%F311.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B13.8%C—
CMS’s current file: 26 of the 145 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8062×

    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.

  • F6001×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6091×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6281×

    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The NM Behavioral Health Institute at Las Vegas, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Nov 19, 2021

    Based on record review and interview, the following was discovered: Facility failed to notify the physician of high blood sugars in [DATE] and beginning of [DATE] for one resident which prevented the Physician from being able to modify the treatment plan. By mid October, resident continued to have high blood sugar levels which were not controlled by sliding scale insulin. After 14 hours of elevated blood sugars (between ,d+[DATE]) facility received order to send resident to ER (emergency room ). Resident expired in facility parking lot prior to transfer. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy being called on [DATE] at 5:01 pm. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Aug 23, 2024

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent abuse for 1 (R #79) of 1 (R #79) resident reviewed when the facility staff failed to recognize the difference between horseplay and unwanted touching and harassment between a staff and resident. This deficient practice likely resulted in R #79 increase of isolation and fear of further abuse. The findings are: A. On 08/19/24 at 2:47 pm, during an interview with R #79, she stated. One of the activities persons kicked me in the ass (buttocks). They (staff) thought she was messing around. I did not think she was messing around, she kicked me. That's not funny. They sent her home for a couple of days. I felt bad because she [Activities Assistant (AA) #1] might have a ton of bills to pay or whatever. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF728Dec 12, 2025

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide documentation confirming 2 (NA #1 and NA #3) of 5 (NA #1, NA #3, NA #4, and NA #5) Nurse Aides had completed a Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program (NATCEP) or a Competency Evaluation Program (CEP) within four months of being employed at the facility. This deficient practice is likely to affect all 102 residents residing in the facility. Residents are likely to experience substandard care because of the use of untrained or unqualified aides providing direct care to residents. The findings are: NA #1:A. Record review of NA #1's personnel record revealed the following:1. NA #1's is a current employee with a hire date of [DATE]. NA #1's date of Certified Nurse Aide Training was completed on [DATE].3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF835Dec 12, 2025

    Based on record review and interview, the facility's Administrator (ADM) and Director of Nursing (DON) failed to administer the facility when they knew/should have known and prevented the following deficient practices which occurred in the facility: 1. Not ensuring staff were trained and/or competent before providing care to residents. 2. Allowing untrained and uncertified nurse aides to train other nurse aides. These deficient practices are likely to affect all 102 residents residing in the facility according to the daily census provided by the Admissions Coordinator (AC) on [DATE] and could lead to residents not maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and social well-being. The findings are: A. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 23, 2024

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner when staff failed to: - Perform hand hygiene and to change gloves as often as necessary to avoid cross contamination, - Store open food protected and with labels and dates to prevent cross contamination and outdated usage, - Utilize hair restraints and beard guards in a manner which restrained all hair while in the kitchen, - Use the sanitizing solution according to manufacturer's instructions, - Protect clean disposable wares (includes dishware, drinkware, and flatware such as spoons, forks, and knives) to prevent contamination, These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination and foodborne which could affect all residents who ate food from the kitchens. […]

Read 37 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 37 of 145 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 12, 2025Standard13 findings
  • Aug 23, 2024Standard9 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 21, 2023Standard4 findings
  • Apr 8, 2022Standard9 findings
  • Nov 19, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 11, 2021Standard15 findings
  • Dec 9, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 28, 2019Complaint1 finding
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • Aug 6, 2019Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 6, 2019Standard8 findings
  • Mar 29, 2018Standard14 findings
  • Mar 5, 2018Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Aug 1, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Jan 5, 2017Complaint6 findings
  • Apr 29, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Aug 21, 2015Standard13 findings
  • Sep 12, 2014Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 6, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Nov 13, 2013—1 finding
  • Jun 5, 2013—2 findings
  • Jul 17, 2012—4 findings
  • Feb 9, 2012—5 findings · 4 harm
  • Aug 26, 2011—4 findings · 3 harm
  • May 6, 2011—4 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction