The Mansion at Brigham
Newburyport, Massachusetts · CCN 225549
25 surveys since 2010, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 110
- Surveys
- 25
- Harm or worse
- 7
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 64
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Essex
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 26 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
Sep 17, 2025
418 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.52 | 3.91 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.53 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J23.0% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D3451.5% | E2131.8% | F34.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B57.6% | C11.5% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6583×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8423×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F5802×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The Mansion at Brigham, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Sep 5, 2023
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect one Resident (#53) from neglect when the Resident was reported to have a significant change in condition out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, on [DATE] Nurse #1 failed to assess the medical emergency timely and call 911 immediately when the Resident was found to have chest pain, was unable to sit up, had significantly elevated blood pressure (,d+[DATE]), a high pulse rate (119) and lost the ability to open his/her left eye. Furthermore, the Nurse failed to provide ongoing monitoring and assessment of the resident's condition. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF726Sep 5, 2023
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skill set to identify, assess, and respond to a significant change in condition, for one Resident (#53), out of a total sample of 29 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to alert EMS of a significant change in condition for greater than two hours when Resident #53 was identified as complaining of chest pain, could not sit up independently, had elevated blood pressure (,d+[DATE]), an elevated pulse (119) and the inability to open his/her left eye. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 29, 2021
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of four sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed as being at increased risk for falls and had a history of [REDACTED].#1's safety was maintained, when he/she was found sitting on a set of stairs past a closed alarmed safety gate, was sent to the Hospital Emergency Department for an evaluation and was diagnosed with [REDACTED]. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record indicated his/her medical history included toxic [MEDICAL CONDITION], dementia with behavioral disturbance, adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, and a history of falls. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF851Sep 17, 2025
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit direct care staffing data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for the entire reporting period, Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter 2, 2025 (January 1 - March 31), in accordance with the schedule specified by CMS. Findings include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Report, CASPER Report 1705D, FY Quarter 2 2025 (January 1 - March 31), indicated the facility triggered for:-Failed to Submit Data for the Quarter (No Data Submitted for Quarter)-One Star Staffing Rating (Staffing Rating Equals 1) During an interview on 9/16/25 at 8:55 A.M., the Director of Nurses said that while she is not responsible for the reporting of the PBJ data, she would expect the facility to submit it as… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Sep 12, 2024
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to annually conduct, review, and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Facility Assessment, dated as 3/4/24, indicated this facility conducts and documents a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for our residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies. The purpose of this policy is to establish responsibilities and procedures for the facility assessment process. 4. […]
Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 110 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 17, 2025Standard9 findings
- Nov 5, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Sep 12, 2024Standard35 findings
- Sep 3, 2024Complaint3 findings
- Jul 17, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 26, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Feb 1, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Sep 5, 2023Standard13 findings · 2 harm
Show the 17 earlier surveys
- Aug 4, 2022Standard1 finding
- Dec 29, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Jan 29, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 1, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Sep 10, 2019Standard6 findings
- Nov 14, 2018Standard6 findings
- Aug 3, 2017Standard3 findings
- Apr 11, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Aug 23, 2016Standard6 findings
- Jun 12, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jul 9, 2014Standard3 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 24, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 3, 2013—6 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 5, 2012—3 findings
- Nov 15, 2011—2 findings
- Aug 5, 2011—1 finding
- Sep 27, 2010—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction