Deficiency Index

The Laurels of Walden Park

Columbus, Ohio · CCN 365379

70 surveys since 2011, 18 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
290
Surveys
70
Harm or worse
18
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file57/70

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
225
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE
County
Franklin
Medicare-certified since
1978

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 88 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Oct 9, 2025

396 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.923.43
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.73—
Annual nurse turnover29.6%48.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$114,649 across 2 penalties
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG35.7%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD4483.0%E59.4%F11.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 53 of the 290 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6845×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6895×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6102×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Laurels of Walden Park, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Aug 13, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, staff interview, interviews with staff at orthopedic medical office, review of National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) guidance, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of pressure ulcers when wearing a splint device and failed to timely identify the resident's pressure ulcers until it reached an advanced stage. Actual harm occurred on 07/30/25 when Resident #37 developed two avoidable unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) pressure ulcers to the underside of the index finger and to the left side of the palm hand when the facility did not remove… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Nov 26, 2024

    Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, review of facility policy and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #215 received adequate, timely and necessary care and services to prevent an acute change in condition related to hypokalemia (decreased potassium) level. Actual Harm occurred beginning on 10/25/24 at 3:33 P.M. when Resident #215's laboratory results reflected a low potassium level of 3.0 mmol/L (normal range 3.5 -5.0) (indicative of hypokalemia) which went unreviewed and unaddressed by facility staff. On 10/28/24 Resident #215 began to experience shortness of breath and required supplemental oxygen. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Aug 18, 2023

    Based on medical record review, wound notes review, staff interview, hospital paperwork review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure wound care orders were in place, as well as ensure comprehensive wound measurements were completed for Former Resident #300 upon readmission to the facility. Actual Harm occurred when Former Resident #300 was found to have maggots in a pre-existing wound to the left calf/foot area and was admitted to the hospital with a gangrenous left foot with maggot infestation and severe pain. This affected one (Former Resident #300) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 201. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Former Resident #300 revealed an original admitted [DATE] with a readmitted [DATE]. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 4, 2022

    Based on medical record review, hospital record review, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #186 was appropriately assisted during a shower resulting in an avoidable fall. This resulted in Actual Harm when State tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #918 failed to utilize two staff to assist during a shower for Resident #186 and the resident rolled off the shower bed, falling onto the tiled shower floor resulting in Resident #186 fracturing her cervical spine and nose. This affected one (Resident #186) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 187. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #186 revealed an admitted [DATE] and a discharge date of [DATE]. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Nov 16, 2021

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, certified nurse practitioner (CNP) interview, and review of the facility policy and procedure for skin management, the facility failed to implement skin integrity monitoring during the use of Multi-podus boots. In addition, the facility failed to accurately document newly developed skin concerns. This affected one resident (Resident #208) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 201. Actual Harm occurred on 07/07/21 when staff failed to monitor the skin integrity for Resident #208 (who required total dependence of two staff members for all activities of daily living due to a diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

Read 35 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 35 of 290 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Oct 9, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 13, 2025Standard and complaint18 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 10, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 11, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 26, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 29, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 28, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 4, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 62 earlier surveys
  • Nov 15, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 18, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 18, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 27, 2023Standard11 findings
  • Nov 8, 2022Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Sep 27, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 4, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 5, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 10, 2022Complaint5 findings
  • Dec 7, 2021Complaint6 findings
  • Nov 16, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 3, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 14, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 23, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 6, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • May 5, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 7, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Mar 15, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Dec 30, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 3, 2020Infection control1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 15, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • May 13, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 7, 2020Standard and complaint27 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 28, 2020Complaint8 findings
  • Nov 14, 2019Complaint4 findings
  • Oct 31, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 17, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 28, 2019Complaint8 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 11, 2019Complaint4 findings
  • Feb 13, 2019Standard18 findings
  • Jan 29, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 5, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 17, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 22, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 25, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 1, 2018Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 10, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 20, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 8, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 21, 2017Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 6, 2017Complaint7 findings
  • Dec 22, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Nov 15, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 18, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • May 13, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 28, 2016Complaint4 findings
  • Mar 23, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 28, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 24, 2015Standard18 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 11, 2014Standard6 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 20, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 5, 2013—2 findings
  • Sep 13, 2013Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 29, 2013Standard14 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 6, 2013Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 30, 2012—1 finding
  • Jul 19, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 11, 2012—1 finding
  • May 25, 2012Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Oct 27, 2011—5 findings
  • Aug 23, 2011—5 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 25, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction