Deficiency Index

The Laurels of Mt. Pleasant

Mt. Pleasant, Michigan · CCN 235385

32 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
189
Surveys
32
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file28/32

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
100
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CIENA HEALTHCARE/LAUREL HEALTH CARE
County
Isabella · rural
Medicare-certified since
1979

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 89 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Michigan.

Last survey on record

Jul 22, 2026

110 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.703.66
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.86—
Annual nurse turnover21.9%47.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD770.0%E330.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 189 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8422×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F5521×

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F5851×

    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.

  • F6441×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Laurels of Mt. Pleasant, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF686Jun 15, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement measures to improve/prevent the development of pressure ulcers and follow best infection control practices for 1 (Resident #10), resulting in the development and worsening of pressure ulcers and infections. Findings include: Review of a Face Sheet revealed R10 is a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the Minimum Data Set, dated dated dated [DATE] revealed R10 is moderately cognitively impaired and requires extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and totally dependent on two staff for transfers. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF656May 23, 2022

    This citation pertains to intake number MI 325. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to increase supervision and assistance to prevent falls for 1 Resident (R1) of 3 resident reviewed for falls, resulting in R1 having a fall resulting in a laceration and ongoing falls. Findings included: Review of R1's face sheet dated, 5/17/22 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female and was last admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a nursing assessment tool, dated 4/20/22 revealed she had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6/15 (severely impaired cognition). […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689May 23, 2022

    This citation pertains to intake number MI 325. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent falls for 1 Resident (R1) of 3 resident reviewed for falls, resulting in R1 having a fall resulting in a laceration and ongoing falls. Findings included: Review of R1's face sheet dated, 5/17/22 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female and was last admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 had diagnoses that included: unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, and unspecified fall, subsequent encounter. Review of R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a nursing assessment tool, dated 4/20/22 revealed she had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6/15 (severely impaired cognition). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 15, 2022

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen resulting in an increased potential for cross contamination of food and foodborne illness, potentially affecting all residents who receive meal services out of the facility's total census of 74 residents. Findings include: 1. On 6/13/22 at 11:09 AM, the kitchen's steam table was observed leaking onto the floor from its lower rear right-hand corner creating a puddle approximately seven inches wide and 15 inches in length. On 6/13/22 at 11:10 AM, upon interview with the Dietary aide, staff B, on the current state of the steam table they stated, it's older, but I didn't know it was leaking. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jul 22, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper food safety handling measures, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness among residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 07/20/2026 at 11:10 AM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) D was observed walking into the walk-in cooler, walking out with a plastic container of ham, and then proceeding to remove portions of the ham with bare hands and placing it in the food processor. When asked, DC D indicated that they would not normally handle the ready-to-eat ham with bare hands. On 07/20/2026 at 11:11 AM, during interview with Kitchen Manager (KM) E, KM E confirmed dietary staff are required to wear gloves when handling ready-to-eat foods with their hands. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 189 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 22, 2026Standard and complaint6 findings
  • May 5, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 26, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Jul 24, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Jun 2, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 15, 2022Standard3 findings · 1 harm
  • May 23, 2022Complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 5, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 24 earlier surveys
  • Sep 3, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 3, 2020Standard26 findings
  • Dec 5, 2019Complaint6 findings
  • Sep 11, 2019Complaint13 findings · 1 harm
  • May 31, 2019Complaint15 findings
  • Mar 21, 2019Complaint4 findings
  • Dec 20, 2018Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Jul 12, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 5, 2018Complaint10 findings
  • Oct 5, 2017Standard and complaint12 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 13, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Jun 20, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 14, 2015Standard6 findings
  • Sep 23, 2015Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 18, 2015Complaint3 findings
  • Dec 5, 2014Standard11 findings
  • Jan 31, 2014—5 findings
  • Jan 17, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 18, 2013—1 finding
  • Mar 8, 2013—10 findings
  • Jun 6, 2012—2 findings
  • Jun 1, 2012—6 findings
  • Feb 15, 2012—2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 6, 2011—6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction