The Gardens Of Cedar Rapids
Cedar Rapids, Iowa · CCN 165621
10 surveys since 2019. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2023.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 32
- Surveys
- 10
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 40
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Linn
- Medicare-certified since
- 2017
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 137 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Iowa.
Last survey on record
Jan 9, 2025
669 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.16 | 3.63 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.16 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 40.9% | 44.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G317.6% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1376.5% | E15.9% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6072×
Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F5801×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6021×
Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
- F6091×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The Gardens Of Cedar Rapids, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF684Sep 7, 2023
Based on clinical record review, staff, family, and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to assure that staff provided appropriate assessments and interventions for one (1) resident who presented with a decline in activities of daily living (ADL's), denial to eat or drink, and a period of apnea (absence of breathing) (Resident #1). This failure resulted the resident in a significant change of condition and sent to the emergency room (ER) for treatment. The facility identified a census of 39 residents. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Sep 7, 2023
Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, resident rights and facility policy review, the facility failed to appropriately assess and treat an identified pressure ulcer for one (1) resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #4). The facility identified a census of 39 residents. Findings Include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 7, 2023
Based on clinical record review, staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews the facility failed to maintain a safe and secure environment by leaving a resident alone on the toilet, who then fell and sustained a hip fracture for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for supervision (Resident #1). The facility identified a census of 39 residents. Findings Include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment form dated 6-15-23 indicated Resident #1 with diagnoses that included cancer, orthostatic hypotension, Parkinson's disease, adult failure to thrive, malaise and atrial fibrillation (AF). […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Jan 18, 2023
Based on clinical record review, staff and Physician interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to assess and implement interventions to prevent the development of a necrotic pressure area related to a cast worn for one out of four residents reviewed (Resident #89). The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Findings Include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers as follows: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Jan 9, 2025
Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to accurately account for controlled/narcotic medications for 3 of the 3 residents reviewed (Residents #89, #90, and #92). The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #89 dated 7/18/24, listed diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, Parkinson's disease, and seizure disorder. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflected a score of 1, severe cognitive impairment. The Care Plan for R#89 dated 4/26/24, directed staff to administer medications as ordered. Monitor and record effectiveness. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 32 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 19, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Jan 9, 2025Standard and complaint7 findings
- Aug 16, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 14, 2024Standard3 findings
- Sep 7, 2023Complaint6 findings · 3 harm
- Jan 18, 2023Standard and complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 16, 2021Standard and complaint3 findings
- Feb 13, 2020Standard2 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
- Jan 10, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jan 3, 2019Standard5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction