Deficiency Index

The Gables of Pelham Skilled Nursing & Rehab

Greenville, South Carolina · CCN 425373

18 surveys since 2011, 12 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
65
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
12
Immediate jeopardy
6
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy6

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
45
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Greenville
Medicare-certified since
2000

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 26 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in South Carolina.

Last survey on record

Jul 24, 2025

473 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.294.05
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.53—
Annual nurse turnover53.1%52.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$11,196 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ220.0%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD660.0%E—F220.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 10 of the 65 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Gables of Pelham Skilled Nursing & Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF605Feb 10, 2025

    Based on manufacturer's recommendation, review of the facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1 was free from chemical restraints, when it was identified that R1 was administered Haloperidol Deaconate (Haldol) for exit seeking, entering patient rooms. The medication was not ordered for an approved indication of use. On 02/07/25 at 2:20 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 10, 2025

    Based on review of the facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that adequate supervision was in place to prevent Resident (R)1 from eloping from the facility. On 12/17/24 at approximately 9:33 PM, R1 was found outside of an exit door on the C-Unit of the facility. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 stated that they heard the alarm sounding off from another unit and felt cold air coming from the door while walking down the hallway. R1 was observed outside of the door in his wheelchair and stated that he was picking berries from the bush. On 12/17/24 at approximately 9:33 PM, the weather was 54 degrees Fahrenheit (F). […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF656Jun 30, 2022

    Based on policy review record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for caregivers to follow for 1 Resident (R)24 of 6 residents reviewed for falls and accidents in a total sample of 12 residents. This failure resulted in harm when one staff instead of two staff changed R24's position in bed resulting in R24 rolling off the bed, sustaining a fracture of two bones in the leg, requiring an extended hospital stay, and resulting in a decline in functional mobility. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 30, 2022

    Based on policy review, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that prevented injuries for 1 Resident (R) 24 of 6 residents reviewed for falls/accidents in a total sample of 12 residents. R24 was rolled onto her side away from the staff caring for her and continued to roll off of the bed onto the floor. This resulted in harm to R24 who sustained broken bones in her leg, a hospitalization of nine days, and functional limitations of movement and mobility. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Condition Change of the Resident, documented the procedure to be .After all resident falls, possible injuries, or changes in physical or mental function .7. Monitor resident's condition frequently until stable. 8. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 24, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods that are stored in the freezer, refrigerators and dry food storage were appropriately sealed, labeled and dated with a use by date and/or discarded after the manufacturer's expiration date. In 2of 2Kitchens, 1of 2Freezers, 1of 2Refrigerators and 1 of 1 Dry Foods Storage.Review of the facility's policy titled Food Receiving and Storage last revised July 2024 revealed, Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies safe food handling practices. 7) Dry foods that are stored in bins will be removed from original packing, labeled and dated (use by date). Such food will be rotated using a first in - first out system. 8. […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 65 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 24, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Feb 10, 2025Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 30, 2022Standard and complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 8, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 7, 2021Standard6 findings
  • Aug 27, 2020Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Mar 14, 2019Standard3 findings
  • May 31, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Nov 16, 2017Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Mar 9, 2017Standard8 findings
  • Apr 21, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Oct 19, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 18, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings · 2 harm
  • Aug 22, 2013—1 finding
  • Sep 12, 2012—2 findings
  • Nov 21, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction