Deficiency Index

The Forest At Duke Inc

Durham, North Carolina · CCN 345542

4 surveys since 2018, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
5
Surveys
4
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2018–2024
’18’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file3/4

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
4
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Durham
Medicare-certified since
2008

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
5
Staffing
1
Quality measures
—

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=1, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Nov 19, 2024

720 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.155.15
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.04—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD—E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B1100.0%C—
CMS’s current file: 1 of the 5 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Forest At Duke Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for minimal, patternF640Nov 19, 2024

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) discharge assessments for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for resident assessment (Resident #5 and Resident #6). The findings included: 1. Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure and hypertension. An admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #5 had received skilled therapy services. Facility documentation indicated Resident #5 had been discharged home on 8/5/24. Review of Resident #5's MDS records revealed the discharge assessment had not been transmitted. An interview was conducted with the MDS Nurse on 11/19/2024 at 1:45 PM who stated Resident #5 was admitted to the facility and had received skilled services. […]

Read all 5 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 19, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Nov 4, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 14, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Jan 20, 2018Standard1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction