The Center at Parmer
Austin, Texas · CCN 676487
13 surveys since 2021, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 34
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 80
- Ownership
- For profit - Individual
- Chain
- VERITAS MANAGEMENT GROUP
- County
- Williamson
- Medicare-certified since
- 2020
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 164 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Texas.
Last survey on record
Jan 30, 2026
283 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.51 | 3.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.69 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 53.5% | 53.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1361.9% | E628.6% | F14.8% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B14.8% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6952×
Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The Center at Parmer, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF697Dec 14, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one of six residents reviewed (Resident #1) for pain management, in that Resident #1 had uncontrolled pain when she did not receive hydrocodone-acetaminophen 10-325 mg PRN as prescribed and requested for three days, due to it not being available in the building. This failure allowed Resident #1 to experience unnecessary pain and placed other residents at risk of uncontrolled pain and diminished quality of life. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF944Sep 1, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include as part of its QAPI program, mandatory training that outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program, for 11 of the 11 staff members reviewed for mandatory training, in that: All eleven staff members reviewed for mandatory training had not received training regarding the facility's QAPI program. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care from staff who are unfamiliar with the facility's QAPI program. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 9, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen. The facility failed to: -Dispose of food stored in the walk-in refrigerator after the use-by date. -A plastic container of salsa and a plastic bag of chopped vegetables was not dated or labeled. -A bag of thawed chicken was not sealed properly in the walk-in refrigerator. This failure placed all residents at risk for food borne illnesses. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Jan 30, 2026
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights and that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 8 sampled residents (R#68). The facility failed to develop a care plan that described the respiratory care/services R#68 would receive for her shortness of breath per her physician's orders made on 10/25/25. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF657Jan 30, 2026
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 8 sampled residents (R#63). The facility failed to revise R#63's care plan to reflect all fall risk interventions recommended by the PCP after his unwitnessed fall on 01/13/26. This failure could place residents at risk of falls, injuries or hospitalization. Review of R#63's admission record, dated 01/29/26, showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including wedge compression fracture, low back pain and altered mental status. Review of R#63's 5-Day MDS assessment, dated 01/15/26, showed he had a BIMS score of 7/15, which indicated he had severe cognitive impairment. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 34 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jan 30, 2026Standard6 findings
- Nov 24, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jul 15, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jun 23, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Oct 31, 2024Standard5 findings
- Feb 13, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Sep 1, 2023Standard4 findings
- Dec 14, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Aug 20, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 17, 2022Standard and complaint4 findings
- Apr 6, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Mar 1, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Jun 9, 2021Standard2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction