The Californian
Santa Barbara, California · CCN 055684
19 surveys since 2010, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 77
- Surveys
- 19
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 68
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Santa Barbara
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Mar 28, 2025
591 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.36 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.51 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 60.0% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D15100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F8422×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F6401×
Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at The Californian, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Aug 20, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ either a dietitian (a licensed health expert on food and nutrition), a qualified nutritional professional (a certified expert who completes specific college degrees, supervised clinical hours, and board exams to provide safe, science-based dietary care and medical nutrition therapy), or a director of food and nutrition services (a senior leader who manages meal programs and kitchen operations such as planning healthy menus, handling budgets, following safety laws, and managing kitchen staff) on a full-time basis (35 hours or more a week). This had the potential to result in the facility's inability to meet the nutritional needs of the residents.During an interview on 8/18/26 at 3:09 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF578Aug 20, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation establishing the legal authority of individuals identified as the Responsible Party (RP) (the person listed by the facility as the resident's representative or contact person who may assist with decisions, paperwork, or communication) and/or legally recognized decision-maker was maintained in the medical record for two of four residents reviewed for advance directives (a legal document in which a person states their healthcare wishes and/or identifies someone to make healthcare decisions for them if they become unable to do so) (Residents #3 and #38), when:Resident #3's medical record did not contain a Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) (a legal document that names another person to make healthcare decisions… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF644Aug 20, 2026
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASSR - a federally required screening of all individuals for Intellectual Disability (ID) or Related Condition and a Serious Mental Illness (SMI) prior to admission) Level 1 was accurate in 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident 65).This failure had the potential to place Resident 65 at risk for unidentified health care needs, lack of services and diminished quality of life.During review of Resident 65's electronic medical record (EMR), the admission Record (AR), dated 8/13/26, indicated Resident #65 was admitted with a diagnosis of unspecified psychosis (loss of touch with reality-such as hallucinations or delusions). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF812Aug 20, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and review, facility staff failed to ensure food temperatures for alternate food items were taken, recorded, and at an acceptable temperature prior to meal service. This failure had the potential to spread foodborne illness to the entire resident population at the facility that receives meals prepared in the kitchen.During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review on 8/17/26 at 11:45 a.m. with Dietary Aide (DA), observed DA getting a chicken breast from the oven (not from the steam table) and placing it on a resident's tray during tray line. DA stated that Resident 52 did not eat pork or beef and the chicken breast was served as an alternative protein. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Aug 20, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program when:Resident meal trays were placed on a Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) carts while staff put on PPE creating a direct pathway of cross contamination by exposing the resident's food to pathogens, body fluids, and/or contaminated surfaces. 2. Deep cleaning of a room was not completed following discontinuation of residents Contact Isolation for one of two sampled residents (Resident 62) These deficient practices had the potential to spread infection to residents in the facility. 1.During lunch tray pass observation on 8/17/26 at 12:12 p.m. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 77 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 20, 2026Standard and complaint5 findings
- Mar 28, 2025Standard4 findings
- Jan 12, 2024Standard8 findings
- Nov 14, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jul 22, 2022Standard3 findings
- Oct 31, 2019Standard5 findings
- Sep 3, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Aug 7, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 11 earlier surveys
- Nov 1, 2018Standard5 findings
- Jul 30, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Oct 19, 2017Standard11 findings
- Oct 28, 2016Standard3 findings
- May 18, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Dec 8, 2015Standard7 findings
- Jan 8, 2015Standard4 findings
- Dec 12, 2013—3 findings
- Dec 3, 2012—2 findings
- Dec 23, 2011—9 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 8, 2010—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction