Deficiency Index

The Blossoms at Newport Rehab & Nursing Center

Newport, Arkansas · CCN 045334

23 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
135
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
120
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
THE BLOSSOMS REHAB & NURSING CENTER
County
Jackson · rural
Medicare-certified since
1997

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 85 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Arkansas.

Last survey on record

May 7, 2026

186 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.703.91
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.34—
Annual nurse turnover71.6%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$21,823 across 2 penalties
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG27.4%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1037.0%E1140.7%F414.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 27 of the 135 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5782×

    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8052×

    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at The Blossoms at Newport Rehab & Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600May 7, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to protect one (Resident #85) of two residents from physical abuse during a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred between Resident #85 and Resident #86 after the secured unit was left unsupervised by LPN #2 and CNA #5, staff who were assigned to the secured unit. The findings include: Resident #85 Review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #85 on 03/28/2025 with diagnoses that included dementia, falls, panic disorders, heart conditions, anxiety, a pacemaker, a defibrillator, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet, mild cognitive impairment, and insomnia. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 28, 2023

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to use a two-person transfer, as determined necessary by the comprehensive care plan, during a mechanical lift transfer of 1 (Resident #1), which resulted in a fall with the resident sent to the emergency room for evaluation of complaint of pain to touch of right hip. This failed practice had the potential to affect 12 residents who require a mechanical lift for transfers. The findings are: Review of Resident #1's comprehensive plan of care dated [DATE], showed the resident was a potential risk for falls, had contractures to bilateral hips and legs, was non ambulatory, and required a mechanical lift x 2 staff for all transfers with a bariatric lift #13 pad. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 7, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff thoroughly washed their hands and changed gloves when contaminated and before handling food and clean equipment when contaminated; food items stored in the refrigerator, freezer and dry storage area were covered or sealed. expired food items and spices were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date; 1 of 1 ice machine and 1 of 1 scoop holder were maintained in a sanitary condition for 2 of 2 meals observed. The findings are: 1. On [DATE] at 9:57 AM, Dietary Aide (DA) #1 pulled her hair net down. Without washing her hands, DA #1 picked up clean plates and stacked them on the cart with her fingers inside of them. 2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 8, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove damaged canned goods from storage areas, and to maintain the kitchen can opener in a clean and sanitary manner. These failed practices had the potential to affect 77 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The findings are: On 12/05/2023 at 04:45 PM, the industrial can opener that was attached to the metal preparation table in the kitchen was encrusted with solid, dried substances. On 12/07/2023 at 10:31 AM, a tour of the kitchen pantry revealed: 1. One 6 pound 9 ounce can of sliced pears with a dent on the top of the can to include the seal. 2. Two 7 pound 5 ounce jellied cranberry sauce with dent on top of the can to include the seal. 3. One can of pork and beans indented on the side of the can. 4. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Dec 8, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure isolation precaution signs with instructions for personal protective equipment (PPE) (gown, mask etc.) needed when entering the room was placed on the door for 2 (Residents #29 and #340) and staff provided proper isolation procedures when dispensing ice for 1 (Resident #340) of 2 (Residents #29 and #340) sampled residents who were on isolation precautions. The findings are: 1. On 12/5/23 at 4:24 pm, observed on Resident #340's door a 'see nurse before entering' sign, and the door was open with 2 large red barrels by the door. There was no signage indicating the resident was on isolation or what personal protective equipment (gown, mask etc.) was needed when entering the room. a. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 135 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 7, 2026Standard2 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 7, 2024Standard and complaint12 findings
  • Jul 3, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 8, 2023Standard13 findings
  • Sep 28, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 7, 2022Standard6 findings
  • Jul 16, 2021Standard13 findings
  • Dec 4, 2020Infection control5 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Nov 9, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 9, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 17, 2020Standard8 findings
  • Dec 14, 2018Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Aug 22, 2018Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 3, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 16, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Oct 21, 2016Standard11 findings
  • Sep 18, 2015Standard10 findings
  • Oct 23, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Dec 13, 2013—7 findings
  • Nov 9, 2012—8 findings
  • May 24, 2012—3 findings
  • Sep 23, 2011—6 findings
  • Aug 12, 2010—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction