Deficiency Index

Tattnall Healthcare Center

Reidsville, Georgia · CCN 115575

15 surveys since 2010, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
71
Surveys
15
Harm or worse
10
Immediate jeopardy
8
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy8

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/15

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
92
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
BEACON HEALTH MANAGEMENT
County
Tattnall · rural
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 49 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Georgia.

Last survey on record

Aug 21, 2025

445 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day2.833.30
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.07—
Annual nurse turnover39.1%46.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1458.3%E729.2%F312.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 24 of the 71 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8042×

    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5801×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

  • F5831×

    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Tattnall Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF881Aug 21, 2025

    Based on interview, record review, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention 8.3, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to ensure an effective antibiotic stewardship program when the Infection Preventionist (IP) did not complete an infection screening evaluation to determine if the correct antibiotics were ordered in order to reduce the development of antibiotic-resistance organisms for residents prescribed antibiotics in the facility. In addition, the Antibiotic Stewardship Program lacked documentation of the tracking or trending of antibiotic usage or where infections occurred in the facility. This failure had the potential to affect all residents' safety related to antibiotic usage and increased the risk of antibiotic-resistance. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 28, 2024

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policies titled, Food Storage, and Sanitation & Food Production, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner for 64 out of 65 residents receiving an oral diet. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff allow the clean dishware to air dry; change gloves after touching soiled dishes, removing clean dishware from dish washer without performing hand hygiene; label and date food stored in reach in cooler and freezer, bulk food item containers had a scoop properly stored; directly touching food items with contaminate gloves during meal service, chemicals were not labeled with the name of the product inside. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 8, 2022

    Based on observations, document review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's dishwasher procedure, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher was operating per manufacturer's requirements to ensure dishes were sanitized and failed to ensure a fan was free of dust and debris while operating in one of one kitchen. The deficient practice affected 70 of 72 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's undated Dishwashing Temperature Procedure revealed, 1. If water is in machine lift drain plug, release all cold water. If there is no water in machine then run water until hot, then insert drain plug. 2. Fill hot water to correct level. 3. If water temp [temperature] is less than 120 degrees, repeat set 1 and 2. 4. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF882Jan 7, 2021

    Based on observations, record review, staff interview, and the facility 's policy titled, Infection Control Preventionist the facility failed to ensure a qualified Infection Preventionist(IP) was on staff at the facility, creating the potential for an ineffective infection prevention program that may contribute to the spread of COVID-19 for all residents in the facility. The census was 59 residents. Findings include: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Preventionist revised 2020, revealed .The Infection Preventionist (ICP) is responsible for the implementation and review of the center 's infection prevention program. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Aug 21, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and hot for three of five residents (R) (R25, R26, and R47) reviewed for food palatability out of a total sample of 33 residents. This failure had the potential for the residents to skip meals and potential for weight loss. Findings included:1. A review of R25's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/6/2025 and located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the MDS tab, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact.During an interview on 8/18/2025 at 11:21 am, R25 stated the food served at the facility did not always taste good. […]

Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 71 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 21, 2025Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Mar 28, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Feb 7, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 6, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 8, 2022Standard9 findings
  • Apr 13, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 7, 2021Infection control3 findings
  • Sep 22, 2020Complaint9 findings · 8 harm
Show the 7 earlier surveys
  • Apr 11, 2019Standard7 findings
  • Mar 22, 2018Standard1 finding
  • Mar 30, 2017Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Jun 11, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Mar 13, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Jul 12, 2012—4 findings
  • Nov 10, 2010—11 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction