Deficiency Index

Sunset Estates of Purcell

Purcell, Oklahoma · CCN 375440

17 surveys since 2011, 5 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
102
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2024
’11’15’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
69
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Mcclain
Medicare-certified since
2003

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 68 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Oklahoma.

Last survey on record

Nov 14, 2024

725 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.273.65
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.26—
Annual nurse turnover43.8%55.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1055.6%E844.4%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 18 of the 102 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6452×

    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities

  • F7002×

    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.

  • F5521×

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

  • F5841×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6411×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Sunset Estates of Purcell, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF584Nov 14, 2024

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure equipment was maintained in good repair in the laundry room. MDS Coordinator #1 identified 56 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 11/14/24 at 11:21 a.m., a tour of the laundry room was conducted. Behind washing machine #2 water was observed on the floor coming out from under the machine. A blanket and a small rug were observed on the floor against the wall behind the washing machine. Both items were observed to be wet. On 11/14/24 at 12:04 p.m., Laundry #1 reported the washing machine had been leaking for about one week. They reported it happened about this time every year. They were asked about the blanket and rug on the floor behind the washing machine. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Nov 14, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff wore eye protection when entering residents' rooms who were COVID-19 positive. MDS Coordinator #1 identified 56 residents resided in the facility. The IP identified 16 residents had tested positive for COVID-19. Findings: An undated Sequence for Putting on Personal Protective Equipment form, documented goggles or faceshield were to be placed over face and eyes. Resident #13 had diagnoses which included COVID-19. A Progress Note, dated 11/11/24 at 4:01 a.m., documented Resident #50 was on isolation due to positive covid test. It documented the resident had a cough at times and was not feeling well. A Progress Note, dated 11/12/24 at 10:46 p.m., documented Resident #11 was covid positive. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Sep 12, 2023

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, documented 52 residents resided in the facility. The dietary manager identified one resident did not receive nutrition from the kitchen. Findings: On 09/07/23 at 9:15 a.m., a brief initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following was observed in the walk in refrigerator during the tour: a. cooked hamburger patties in gallon Ziploc bag, dated 09/04/23, b. pre-cooked sausage patties in an opened box, dated 09/03/23, c. an open box below the pre-cooked sausage patties containing raw, uncooked bacon, dated 09/01/23, d. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF645Oct 20, 2022

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to correctly identify an individual with a mental disorder for two (#16 and #33) of two residents sampled for PASRR level I screening. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 18 residents had documented psychiatric diagnoses. Findings: 1. Res #33 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . A PASRR I screening, completed on 11/01/19, documented, No to all questions regarding mental illness. A quarterly assessment, dated 09/10/22, documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition and had no behaviors during the look back period. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF693Oct 20, 2022

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented two residents had ordered tube feedings. Findings: Res #42 had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . A admission assessment, dated 10/07/22, documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition, required extensive to total assistance with activities of daily living, and had a feeding tube. A physician order, dated 08/01/22, documented start enteral feed at 50 ml per hour in the afternoon related to encounter for attention to gastrostomy. There was no documentation on the order for the type, strength, or time frame for the feeding to be administered to the resident. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 102 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 14, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Sep 12, 2023Standard6 findings
  • Feb 2, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 20, 2022Standard9 findings
  • Jun 16, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • May 18, 2020Infection control1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 6, 2019Standard10 findings
  • Apr 23, 2018Complaint1 finding
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Jun 13, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Feb 9, 2017Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 20, 2016Standard10 findings
  • Jul 9, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 11, 2015Standard9 findings
  • Jan 8, 2014—10 findings
  • Nov 8, 2012—15 findings · 2 harm
  • May 10, 2012—1 finding
  • Aug 25, 2011—14 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction