Deficiency Index

Sunrise Terrace Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Winfield, Iowa · CCN 165327

8 surveys since 2011, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
13
Surveys
8
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/8

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
46
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Henry · rural
Medicare-certified since
1997

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=3, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 9, 2025

488 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.143.63
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.94—
Annual nurse turnover12.1%44.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD—E1100.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 1 of the 13 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Sunrise Terrace Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF804Jul 9, 2025

    Based on observations, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain palatable food at minimum safe temperatures for 1 of 1 meals observed. The facility reported a census of 36 residents.Findings include:1. During an observation on 7/7/25 at 11:43 a.m., Staff A, [NAME] started to serve lunch. The meal included breaded fish, green beans, and french fries. During the service, the lights of the steam table were not illuminated. During an interview on 7/7/25 at 12:37 p.m., Staff A stated she completed serving the meal. The State Agency (SA) requested a test tray. With the Certified Dietary Manager present and with the use of a facility thermometer the following food temperatures were obtained: a. Breaded fish 132.5 degrees F (Fahrenheit). b. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Aug 26, 2026

    Based on record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to address an antipsychotic on a resident's care plan for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 36 residents. Findings include: Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 scored a score of 99, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated active diagnoses for severe vascular dementia (brain damage from impaired blood flow) with other behavioral disturbance, and anxiety disorder (excessive worry or fear). The MDS revealed Resident #5 took an antipsychotic on a routine basis. The Care Plan Focus revised 6/3/25 indicated Resident #5 had impaired cognition related to vascular dementia. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Aug 2, 2021

    Based on clinical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 1 residents who eloped (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented diagnoses of dementia, depression, and anxiety. Resident #1 had short and long-term memory impairment and walked independently without the use of mobility devices. The resident had not wandered during the 7-day look-back period and used a wander/elopement alarm daily. The Care Plan identified wandering as a focus area on 12/31/18 with interventions: a. Resident to wear a Wanderguard (a type of wander alarm), which is checked for placement and functioning, to ensure safety. […]

Read all 13 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 26, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Jul 9, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Aug 2, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 8, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Sep 17, 2015Standard4 findings
  • May 25, 2012—2 findings
  • Jan 31, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 28, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction