Deficiency Index

Sunrise Hill Care Center

Traer, Iowa · CCN 165286

18 surveys since 2011, 7 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
39
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
7
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
76
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Tama · rural
Medicare-certified since
1996

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Dec 4, 2025

340 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.263.54
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.36—
Annual nurse turnover10.3%44.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG133.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD266.7%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 39 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Sunrise Hill Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 4, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide safety interventions required for 2 out of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #1 and #2). Resident #2 required assist of 1 staff with a gait belt (a belt placed around the waist to aide in safe transfers and ambulation) for transfers and ambulation. A Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) let go of the gait belt resulting in Resident #2 falling and fracturing her hip. Resident #1 was to not be left unattended in his room unless he was in bed. Resident #1 was found on floor unattended at least twice in his room. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include: 1. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 10, 2023

    Based on facility and Hospital records review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for residents to avoid falls with injuries to occur for 2 out of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #1 and #2). Staff A, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), let go of Resident #1's gait belt, which resulted in Resident #1 tripping over her walker, falling, and sustaining a fractured hip. Staff B, CNA, stepped out of Resident #2's room to grab an EZ Stand Lift (transferring device) and did not lower Resident #2's bed, which resulted in Resident #2 falling out of a bed that was not in it's lowest position, thus resulting in a fractured leg and rib/s for the resident. The facility reported a census of 53. Findings Include: 1. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Oct 21, 2021

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 3 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1, #2, #3). On 5/20/21, Staff J, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) walked with the resident toward the bed without using a gait belt around the resident's waist in accordance with facility policy. As Staff J pulled back the covers on the bed, the resident stumbled backward, fell into a cabinet, and slid to the floor. On 5/22/21, Resident #1 could not bear weight on the right leg and exhibited facial grimacing, and staff sent Resident #1 to the emergency room (ER). The resident subsequently admitted to the hospital with a right [CONDITION(S)]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Oct 21, 2021

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the staff used acceptable infection control standards of practices to protect from potential infection by not performing hand hygiene between resident contact and after resident care, and failed to comply with current infection control standards for proper use of eye protection. The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. In an observation on 10/12/21 at 11:25 AM, Staff A, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA), removed a resident's facemask and placed the facemask on the handle of the resident's wheelchair. Staff A, CNA, without performing hand hygiene, proceeded to remove 2 more residents' facemasks and place them on the handles of the residents' wheelchairs. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF607Dec 4, 2025

    Based on personnel record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy when the facility failed to complete the required Abuse and Criminal History check within the required 30 days of hire date for 1 of 5 staff reviewed (Staff A, Dietary). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: Staff A's personnel record review listed a hire date of 4/14/25. The record review included the Single Contact License and Background Check (SING) with a completion date of 1/31/25. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 39 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 4, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Jul 17, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 4, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 10, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 21, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 11, 2019Standard and complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • May 23, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 15, 2018Standard8 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Nov 22, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 15, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Apr 7, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 21, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 7, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Jan 15, 2015Standard1 finding
  • Dec 5, 2013—2 findings
  • Sep 25, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 26, 2012—7 findings
  • Sep 23, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction