Deficiency Index

Stewartville Care Center

Stewartville, Minnesota · CCN 245349

27 surveys since 2010, 11 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
162
Surveys
27
Harm or worse
11
Immediate jeopardy
4
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy4

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/27

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Olmsted
Medicare-certified since
1986

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 123 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Minnesota.

Last survey on record

Jun 18, 2026

144 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.364.22
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.89—
Annual nurse turnover60.3%42.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG25.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2461.5%E820.5%F512.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 39 of the 162 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5543×

    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

  • F7553×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

  • F8012×

    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Stewartville Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF686Feb 2, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and implement pressure ulcer interventions for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who was admitted to the facility without pressure ulcers. The facility failed to provide ongoing comprehensive skin assessments, monitor for signs of infection/deterioration and ensure R1 was seen at the wound clinic per physician orders. As a result, R1 had a life threatening infection that required an above the knee amputation resulting in an immediate jeopardy. The IJ began on 12/20/22, when R1 was transferred to hospital-B for left above knee amputation related to diagnoses of osteomyelitis (bone infection) and calcaneus sepsis (life threatening bone infection that has spread through the body) from R1's pressure ulcer. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jan 30, 2023

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect when they allowed two nursing assistants (NA)-A, NA-B, who were suspected of chemical impairment to work in the facility. NA-A and NA-B both tested positive for illicit drugs. 3 of 3 residents (R2, R3, R4) sustained falls that resulted in injuries when NA-A and NA-B did not follow the care plan. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for resident health and safety when NA-A and NA-B provided care. The IJ began on 1/18/23, when the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect when they allowed two nursing assistants who tested positive of chemical impairment to work in the facility. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Apr 7, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R4) when R1 who had a history of cognitive impairment, personality changes, impulsiveness, and making poor choices, repeatedly yelled at R4, made a threat to shoot him in the head, and entered his room on three different occasions.Findings include: R4's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], he was cognitively intact, no depression or behaviors. He was occasionally incontinent with bowel movements and frequently incontinent with urination. His care areas triggered activities of daily living, urinary incontinence, falls, and pressure ulcers. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jun 12, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement care planned fall interventions for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents. This resulted in actual harm for R1 who had an unwitnessed fall while self-transferring when the motion sensor alarm did not sound and failed to alert staff that R1 was self-transferring as intended per care plan. Additionally, the facility failed to determine why the motion sensor alarm did not alert staff following the fall and added a second alarm. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had dementia, anxiety, and depression with severe cognitive deficits. R1 used a wheelchair and walker, was frequently incontinent of bladder and occasional incontinent of bowel. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801May 24, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ either a full-time registered dietitian (RD) or a qualified dietary manager (DM) to carry out the functions of the food and nutritional service. This had the potential to affect 45 of 45 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 5/24/24 at 9:12 a.m., [NAME] (C)-A, indicated the previous DM walked out earlier this month and the regional manager quit in April (2024). C-A had been doing the orders and the schedule for the past week. During a clarifying interview on 5/24/24 at 12:30 p.m., C-A stated she has not had any formal training for DM position and there was [NAME] currently in training for that position. […]

Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 162 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 18, 2026Standard6 findings
  • Apr 7, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Dec 4, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 3, 2025Standard6 findings
  • Dec 12, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 12, 2024Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • May 24, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 11, 2024Standard8 findings
Show the 19 earlier surveys
  • Feb 16, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 2, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jan 30, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 22, 2022Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Jan 21, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 27, 2020Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 13, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • May 28, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Feb 28, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 13, 2019Standard and complaint27 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 20, 2018Standard7 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 25, 2016Standard12 findings
  • Jun 17, 2015Standard15 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 10, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Feb 1, 2013—18 findings
  • May 24, 2012—11 findings
  • Aug 18, 2011—7 findings
  • Dec 21, 2010—6 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction