Deficiency Index

St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare

Cherry Hill, New Jersey · CCN 315060

18 surveys since 2011, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
92
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
215
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP
County
Camden
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 168 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in New Jersey.

Last survey on record

Apr 30, 2026

193 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.313.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.41—
Annual nurse turnover54.4%41.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2972.5%E615.0%F410.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B12.5%C—
CMS’s current file: 40 of the 92 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8804×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6102×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 6, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/02/2024 from 9:35 until 10:00 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Dietary Director (DD) observed the following in the kitchen: 1. In the walk-in refrigerator, on an orange tiered cart, 15 bags of hot dog rolls with a received by date of 11/11/24. The DD stated he will get rid of them. 2. In the walk-in refrigerator on the second shelf, an opened plastic container of prepared cucumber salad with a received by date of 11/21/24. The DD stated he will get rid of the cucumbers. 3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF847Dec 6, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to explicitly contain any language to inform the resident or his or her representative of his or her right not to sign the agreement as a condition of admission to, or as a requirement to continue to receive care at the facility and failed to contain any language allowing the resident or anyone else to communicate with federal, state, or local officials. The deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents that signed the binding arbitration clause. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the the facility admission packet included an Arbitration Agreement, titled, Voluntary, Binding Arbitration. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF804Oct 19, 2023

    REPEAT DEFICIENCY Complaint # NJ 159503, NJ 160417, NJ 162667 Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to consistently serve foods at safe and appetizing temperatures. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 units reviewed and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 10/05/23 At 12:25 PM, the surveyor observed large stainless trays with lunch food arrive to the day room one steam table. There were 13 residents seated in day room one waiting for lunch to be served. All of the other unit residents from the first floor had lunch in their rooms. The food service staff began making lunch trays from the steam table. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF865Oct 19, 2023

    Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program's (QAPI) sources of quantitative data was being analyzed to evaluate program effectiveness and implement new processes. This deficient practice was identified during the standard survey and was evidenced by the following: Refer to F 804 F During the standard survey, the surveyors conducted meal observations on 10/5/23 and on 10/10/23. On 10/5/23 beginning at 12:25 PM, the surveyor observed the lunch service in day room one. The surveyor observed the lunch tray preparation begin at 12:25 PM, and ended with the last lunch tray served at 1:05 PM. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF806Feb 27, 2025

    Complaint #: NJ183456 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate resident preferences with specific food items that were documented on the resident's meal tickets. This deficient practice was identified for 4 out of 6 sampled residents, Resident #1, #2, #4, and #5 and was evidenced by the following: According to the Admission Record (an admission summary), Resident #2 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Hypertension (high blood pressure) and Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility (changes in walk pattern). According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 2/4/25, Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating cognitively intact. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 92 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 30, 2026Standard5 findings
  • Nov 21, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 27, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 6, 2024Standard5 findings
  • Oct 19, 2023Standard20 findings
  • Jun 21, 2022Standard8 findings
  • Jan 31, 2020Standard5 findings
  • Mar 21, 2019Standard5 findings
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Feb 13, 2018Standard7 findings
  • Dec 15, 2016Standard7 findings
  • Aug 23, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 25, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Jan 28, 2015Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Feb 28, 2014Standard11 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 25, 2013—3 findings
  • Jan 30, 2013—3 findings
  • Jan 10, 2012—1 finding
  • Jan 31, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction