Deficiency Index

St Luke's Helen G Nassif Transitional Care Center

Cedar Rapids, Iowa · CCN 165389

19 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
45
Surveys
19
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/19

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
46
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Linn
Medicare-certified since
1998

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
5
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=17, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 5, 2026

249 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.213.76
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.15—
Annual nurse turnover36.6%40.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD466.7%E116.7%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B116.7%C—
CMS’s current file: 6 of the 45 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at St Luke's Helen G Nassif Transitional Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Jan 18, 2024

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to label and date food items when opened to reduce the risk of contamination and food-borne illness. The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Findings Include: On 1/16/24 at 10:08 AM, during the initial tour of the facility kitchen revealed the following food items not labeled or dated when opened: a. A bag of frozen baby baker potatoes. b. A bag of frozen mixed vegetables. c. A bag of frozen fajita blend vegetables. d. A bag of frozen cascade blend vegetables. e. A bag of frozen pasta. f. A bag of frozen garlic bread. g. A bag of elbow macaroni noodles. h. A bag of egg noodles. i. A bag of spaghetti noodles. j. A bag of long grain rice. k. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF655Nov 10, 2022

    Based on observations, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to have the residents' Baseline Care Plans available for staff to review for 4 out of 4 resident reviewed (Resident #76, #77, #78, and #79). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings Include: 1. The Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) for Resident # 76 dated 11/3/22, listed diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The MDS reflected the residents Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 11 out of 15 (moderately impaired) and the resident lacked wandering behaviors in the look back period. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF761Nov 10, 2022

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to adequately count narcotics and provide secure storage for medications during 1 out of 3 observations of a Narcotic Count between two shifts. The facility reported 9 residents with Doctor Orders for narcotic medications. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings Include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #17 shown diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . The MDS identified Resident #17 scored a 9 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairments. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jun 3, 2021

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review the facility failed to properly cover clean laundry carts in an effort to reduce the risk of spreading infections. The facility reported a census of 19 residents. Finding Includes: Observation on 6/2/21 at 8:40 AM, revealed Staff A, Environmental Services, passed personal laundry to several resident rooms in an uncovered wire cart. The laundry is stored individually in mesh bags but not covered. During the Laundry Tour on 6/2/21 at 1:45 PM, Staff A presented a clean linen cart with a see through mesh cover used during the transportation of clean linens. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF550Mar 5, 2026

    Based on staff and resident interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated in a dignified manner for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Residents #3). The facility reported a census of 41 residents.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15, and had the following diagnoses: Chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, diabetes mellitus and morbid obesity. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 45 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 5, 2026Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Jan 30, 2025Standard and complaint1 finding
  • Apr 18, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 18, 2024Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Nov 10, 2022Standard and complaint7 findings
  • Jun 3, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Jul 18, 2019Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Apr 26, 2018Standard2 findings
Show the 11 earlier surveys
  • Jan 26, 2017Standard1 finding
  • Feb 25, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Sep 3, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 26, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Nov 12, 2014Complaint3 findings
  • Jan 23, 2014—3 findings
  • Dec 13, 2012—1 finding
  • Nov 10, 2011—4 findings
  • Aug 11, 2011—4 findings
  • May 25, 2011—1 finding
  • Nov 5, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction