Deficiency Index

St Josephs Home

Ogdensburg, New York · CCN 335087

8 surveys since 2012, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
22
Surveys
8
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2026
’12’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file5/8

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
82
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
St. Lawrence · rural
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=11, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 20, 2026

234 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.024.13
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.36—
Annual nurse turnover27.8%43.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD763.6%E327.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B19.1%C—
CMS’s current file: 11 of the 22 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6071×

    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

  • F6841×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6981×

    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at St Josephs Home, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Mar 20, 2026

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality during meal service in two (2) of two (2) dining rooms (First and Second floor dining rooms). Specifically, residents stated they were not allowed to visit residents at other tables and/or visitors were not allowed to visit in the dining rooms during and after mealtimes. Findings include: The facility policy Resident's Rights Policy, reviewed 11/2025, documented the residents were provided a homelike environment which fully provides their right to a dignified existence. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700Mar 29, 2024

    Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 3/25/2024-3/29/2024, the facility did not review the risks and benefits of enabler rails or obtain informed consent prior to the installation of enabler rails with the resident or resident representative for 10 of 10 residents (Residents #2, #4, #81, #41, #60, #71, #59, #23, #80, and #62) reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence the risks and benefits of enabler rails were explained to the residents, or their representatives or consents were obtained prior to bed rail use for Residents #2, #4, #81, #41, #60, #71, #59, #23, #80, and #62 Findings include: The facility policy Physical Restraints last reviewed 9/2023, documented the facility is committed to reducing the use of… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Mar 29, 2024

    48675 Based on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey conducted 3/25/2024-3/29/2024, the facility did not ensure storage, preparation, distribution, and service of food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 main kitchen. Specifically, the main kitchen had undated and uncovered food, the food slicer and can opener had food debris on them, and ceiling tiles and walls were not clean. Findings include: The facility policy Kitchen Cleaning Standards revised 5/2023 documented cleaning of the kitchen is a difficult task as many things need to occur to prepare meals, meet resident needs, and assure appropriate food temperatures. Cleaning the kitchen is everyone's responsibility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Mar 20, 2026

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choice for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #3) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #3 had diabetes and was responsible for reading their own blood sugar results with a blood glucose sensor device (a small sensor-based system applied to the back of the arm that provides continuous glucose readings without finger sticks). The resident's twice a day weekly blood glucose finger sticks was discontinued without a medical order and their blood glucose levels and sliding scale insulin were not documented as completed two (2) times in March 2026. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF698Mar 20, 2026

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis services (filtration of blood when the kidneys do not work) received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #12) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #12 received hemodialysis treatments at a community-based dialysis center, and the facility did not have a plan to adequately monitor and care for the resident pre and post dialysis. Findings include:There was no documented evidence of a dialysis policy.Resident #12 had diagnoses including chronic kidney disease and dependence on dialysis. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 22 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 20, 2026Standard5 findings
  • Mar 29, 2024Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Dec 10, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Jun 6, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Aug 11, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Jun 4, 2015Standard2 findings
  • May 16, 2013—1 finding
  • May 2, 2012—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction