St George Healthcare Center
Saint George, South Carolina · CCN 425143
24 surveys since 2011, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 140
- Surveys
- 24
- Harm or worse
- 10
- Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
- 7
Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 88
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE
- County
- Dorchester
- Medicare-certified since
- 1981
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 41 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in South Carolina.
Last survey on record
Feb 17, 2026
265 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.17 | 3.30 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.48 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 30.6% | 47.1% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $16,894 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J17.7% | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G17.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D969.2% | E17.7% | F17.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5501×
Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
- F6231×
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
- F6251×
Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at St George Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Sep 19, 2024
Based on review of facility policy, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision for Resident (R)1, resulting in R1 successfully eloping from the facility, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. On 09/18/24 at 3:35 PM, the Administrator was notified that the failure to ensure a resident receives appropriate supervision, to prevent an elopement, constituted Immediate Jeopardy at F689. On 09/18/24 at 3:35 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template, informing the facility IJ existed as of 09/15/24. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.25 - Quality of Care. On 09/18/24, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jun 27, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to Resident (R)1 necessary to R1 to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress for 1 of 9 residents reviewed. R1 exited the facility on 06/22/2023 at approximately 7:55 AM and was found at 8 AM. Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA)1 found the resident in the receptionist's car. This was confirmed by the receptionist, administrator, housekeeping staff #1 and #2, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA)1, and the Assistant Director of Nursing. The resident was known to be an elopement risk, but no interventions were put in place to protect the resident from elopement. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 27, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision necessary to prevent elopement for 1 of 9 residents reviewed. R1 eloped from the facility on 06/22/2023 at approximately 7:55 AM and was found at 8 AM. Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA)1 found the resident in the receptionist's car. This was confirmed by the receptionist, administrator, housekeeping staff #1 and #2, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA)1, and the Assistant Director of Nursing. The resident was known to be an elopement risk, but no interventions were put in place to protect the resident from elopement. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 8, 2023
Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA1) followed the resident positioning procedure during resident care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident (R) 16) reviewed for accidents out of a total sample of 21 residents. As a result of the deficient practice R16 fell and was harmed when she sustained bilateral leg fractures. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Hartman's Nursing Assistant Basics Fifth Edition revealed when positioning a resident .Gently slide your hands under the resident's head and shoulders and move them toward you. Gently slide your hands under her midsection and move it toward you. Gently slide your hands under the hips and legs and move them toward you . […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF806Sep 8, 2022
Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)6 was served meals in accordance with allergies, intolerances, and preferences for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, the facility served R6 shrimp, which had the potential of resulting in a life threatening incident. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Nutrition dated 08/01/20, revealed The Nutrition Service Director (NSD) or designee is responsible for training culinary staff on how to handle foods to avoid any inappropriate foods being served to patients or residents with food allergies. This may include special designated food preparation space in the case of life threatening food allergies. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 140 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 17, 2026Standard4 findings
- Jan 9, 2025Standard2 findings
- Sep 19, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 27, 2023Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 8, 2023Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 18, 2022Complaint3 findings
- Sep 8, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Aug 13, 2021Standard5 findings
Show the 16 earlier surveys
- Feb 23, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Sep 13, 2019Standard16 findings
- Sep 27, 2018Standard12 findings
- Jul 11, 2018Complaint4 findings
- Feb 27, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Jul 14, 2017Standard15 findings
- Sep 9, 2016Standard6 findings
- Sep 25, 2015Standard7 findings
- Sep 23, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Jul 18, 2014Standard and complaint20 findings
- Aug 20, 2013—1 finding
- Jul 11, 2013—1 finding
- Jan 22, 2013—1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 18, 2012—10 findings · 4 harm
- May 31, 2012—5 findings
- Nov 10, 2011—14 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction