St Anthony Health & Rehabilitation
St Anthony, Minnesota · CCN 245267
29 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 195
- Surveys
- 29
- Harm or worse
- 5
- Immediate jeopardy
- 3
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 110
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Anoka
- Medicare-certified since
- 1984
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 30 facilities of 100–127 beds in Minnesota.
Last survey on record
Jun 18, 2026
144 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.73 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.13 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 42.6% | 37.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $10,203 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2779.4% | E25.9% | F514.7% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6843×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F8833×
Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
- F5542×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F7562×
Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at St Anthony Health & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF698Jun 7, 2022
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide transportation to two scheduled [CONDITION(S)] appointments for 1 of 2 residents (R1) who required [CONDITION(S)] for [CONDITION(S)]. Facility failed to notify the physician and coordinate care with the [CONDITION(S)] clinic. In addition, the facility failed to adequately monitor/assess for signs and symptoms of fluid overload which resulted in admission to the ICU related to fluid overload resulting in an immediate jeopardy (IJ). The IJ began on 4/30/22, when the facility failed to transport R1 to a [CONDITION(S)] appointment resulting in a missed [CONDITION(S)] treatment. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678May 24, 2021
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop a system to ensure residents cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) status was accurately reflected throughout the medical record and 2 of 2 resident's (R26 and R74) whose wishes would not had been honored in the event of cardiopulmonary arrest (cessation of heart beat and breathing). This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation for R26 who would not had received CPR in the event of a cardiopulmonary arrest and was at risk for death. The IJ began on [DATE], at 1:10 p.m. when R26's Health Care Directive Summary (HCDS) reflected do-not-resuscitate status, which was contrary to the physicians order and R26's wishes for CPR. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689May 24, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided during meals for 1 of 3 residents (R75) identified to be at risk for choking. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation for R75, who was eating unsupervised in the facility dining room and staff was not aware the resident began to choke. Further, the facility failed to implement interventions as directed by the care plan or ensure a resident wore appropriate footwear to prevent a fall for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R22) reviewed for falls. This resulted in actual harm for R1 when only one staff person assisted R1 with incontinence cares, she rolled out of bed and on the floor, and suffered three rib fractures and a dislocated finger. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jun 18, 2026
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper usage of personal protective equipment (PPE) while sorting soiled linens and personal laundry. This had the potential to affect all 92 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:During tour of the laundry room on 6/16/26 at 3:17p.m. no PPE was observed anywhere in the dirty linen sorting area.On 6/16/26 at 3:17 p.m. housekeeping supervisor (HS) confirmed staff do not wear the required PPE while sorting soiled laundry. HS stated they will wear gloves but no other items. This had been the practice since they started working in the laundry room the previous year.On 6/16/26 at 3:09 p.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867Apr 10, 2025
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance Assessment and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI) committee effectively sustained ongoing compliance related to repeat citations from past surveys in regards to quality of care, care plans and self-administration of medications (SAM) which were also identified during this survey. This had the potential to effect all 74 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility CASPER Report dated 3/17/2025, identified the facility was cited F684 for quality of care, F656 development/implementation of comprehensive care plans, and F554 SAM during the survey exited 3/7/2024. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 195 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 18, 2026Standard6 findings
- Jul 22, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 10, 2025Standard7 findings
- Feb 12, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Oct 7, 2024Complaint4 findings
- Mar 7, 2024Standard and complaint12 findings
- Jan 20, 2023Standard2 findings
- Jan 13, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 21 earlier surveys
- Jul 13, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 7, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 24, 2021Complaint1 finding
- May 24, 2021Standard and complaint14 findings · 2 harm
- Oct 25, 2019Standard and complaint17 findings
- Aug 12, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 2, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Feb 21, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Dec 14, 2018Standard and complaint19 findings
- Oct 27, 2017Standard15 findings
- Jan 6, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Nov 9, 2016Standard4 findings
- Oct 29, 2015Standard15 findings
- Nov 21, 2014Standard13 findings
- Aug 21, 2014Complaint4 findings
- Jan 3, 2014—3 findings
- Mar 4, 2013—13 findings
- Feb 28, 2013Standard13 findings
- Jan 6, 2012—12 findings
- Dec 9, 2010—7 findings
- Oct 14, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction