Every finding on record at St. Anne's Home

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a registered nurse to serve full-time as the Director of Nurses (DON). The last designated DON ended employment in December, 2022. A waiver from this requirement was not obtained by the facility. The facility has been without a designated DON for 11 months. This failure had the potential to affect the quality of care and outcomes of resident care. Findings: During an interview on 11/13/23, at 2:30 PM, the acting Director of Nurses, (DON) stated she was the interim DON and was considering the salary offer before considering an offer of full-time designated DON. The last designated DON ended employment in December, 2022, 11 months ago. She stated she did not have a DON business card. Record Review of facility document provided on 11/14/23 indicated, Currently we have an interim Nurse Manager/DON who works 40 hrs./week. Record Review of facility Organizational Chart obtained on 11/15/23 indicated, . Nurse Manager, RN-interim. The Director of Nurses was not indicated on the organizational chart. During an interview in the conference room, on 11/15/23, at 8:45 AM, the Administrator and acting DON announced the designation of a full-time Director of Nurses (DON), effective today, 11/15/23. Record Review of unsigned, Director of Nurses job description included, . a full-time, Monday through Friday, 8 AM to 4:30 PM position .Ensure that nursing services assure flexibility to staff to meet residents' preferences. Maximize resident quality of life and quality of care from the time of admission to discharge/end of life .Participate in nursing management rounds (all shifts) and administrative to promote prompt assessment of resident behavior and/or response to interventions . Assure the provision of all services, treatments, nutritional preferences, pain management and comfort measures are appropriate and available for each resident's condition and especially at end-of-life. At least annually, review with social services the resident/responsible party advance directives/life care preferences to keep abreast of any changes of intent and potential conflicts .Assure that substantial compliance with applicable federal, state and local standards and regulations for nursing services align .Immediately initiate investigation into incidents, accidents, abuse and concerns/complaints raised by residents, personnel, family members or others. Adhere to all administrative and nursing policies and procedures, including but not limited to HIPAA, (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, covers privacy, security and breach notification rules), safety/OSHA, (Occupational Safety and Health Act, ensures safe and healthful working conditions for workers), infection prevention, residents rights, quality improvement and assurance indicators .Hold all nursing staff accountable for job performance . Record review of undated policy titled, Director of Nursing Policy indicated, .The Director of Nurses assumes responsibility for organizing and managing all aspects of the nursing program in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, alongside the mission, vision and values of the facility .These standards and guidelines are designed to attain the highest possible degree of quality of life and quality of care across multi-levels of aging services; ranging from residential care to skilled nursing. The Director of Nursing shall be a registered nurse and shall be employed eight hours a day, on the day shift, five days a week .

Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure food was served in a sanitary environment when: 1. Three window screens had gaps, one window screen was missing, and a door screen had a gap. 2. One onion was rotting, and four onions were sprouting in the produce container. 3. A fan over the dishwashing area had grills that were caked with dust. 4. Observation of the pantry found one dented can and one can without a label. Findings: During initial kitchen observation on 11/13/2023 at 9:34 AM, three window screens were not covering the window openings. There were gaps along the edges of these window screens. One window near the dishwashing area was wide open and did not have a window screen. Observation of the back service door screen from the inside indicated there was a gap (at the right lower corner) between the door screen and the door frame. Observation of the fresh produce bin found one onion rotting and four onions sprouting. Observation of a fan over the dishwashing area indicated the grills of the fans were caked with a fine layer of fuzzy grey/dark matter. Observation of the pantry found one dented can and one can without a label. These observations were shared with the Director of Dining Service (DDS) on 11/15/2023 at 2:29 PM. The DDS did not provide an explanation why the window screen issues, and the door screen issue were not reported to maintenance. The DDS stated they have a system in place to check the donated fresh produce minimally on a weekly basis and provided no explanation why these rotting or old onions were not removed. The DDS stated kitchen staff clean the kitchen on a regular basis and he will remind staff to put cleaning the fan grills on the schedule. The DDS stated they have a system in place to remove dented cans and cans without labels. He offered no explanation why the cans were not removed.

Based on observation and interview, facility staff failed to close their garbage dumpster when not being loaded. This failure had the potential to attract pests and rodents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview regarding the facility's dumpsters on 11/16/2023 at 1:45 PM, the metal lid of the garbage dumpster was found propped opened. The Maintenance Tech (MT) stated that some of the smaller women staff may have a hard time opening these heavy dumpster lids and maybe injuring their hands. That was why the garbage dumpster was propped opened.

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program when: 1. A flying insect was seen over the produce bin in the kitchen. 2. An ant was found in the second-floor food service area. Failure to maintain an effective pest control program placed residents at risk for food contamination and food borne illnesses. Findings: During initial kitchen observation on 11/13/2023 at 9:34 AM, a flying insect was flying above the produce bin over a rotting onion. During tray line observation on 11/14/2023 at 12:15 PM, an ant was seen crawling on the food service counter in the second-floor dining area. This observation was verified with the Director of Dining Services. During an interview on 11/16/2023 at 1:20 PM, the Maintenance Tech (MT) stated the facility has a contract with a pest control company and the pest company comes on a monthly basis and also on an as needed basis. The MT acknowledged that it may be difficult to keep flying pests out of the kitchen if there were window screens and door screen issues. Additionally, the MT stated he was given a product in an injector to control ants. The MT admitted he was not formally trained and/or licensed to apply this product in a commercial setting.

Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to promptly notify the physician and/or do a more comprehensive assessment for Resident 30, one of three sampled residents who had a fall and complained of pain. Resident 30 had a fall then complained of pain. It took almost 8 hours before staff obtained an x-ray to confirm a right leg fracture. Findings: Review of Resident 30's record titled, Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated she was alert and oriented, able to make her needs known and able to understand others. Additionally, her MDS indicated she did not have any behaviors such as rejecting care, she was wheelchair bound and dependent on staff for assistance. Review of Resident 30's record titled Alert Note, dated 9/7/2023, indicated Resident reported she slid out of her chair to the floor . Review of Resident 30's record titled Fall, dated 9/7/2023, indicated .Resident complained of right hip pain at first but after placed in bed and assessed does not complain of pain. Review of Resident 30's record titled Order Note EMAR, dated 9/8/2023 at 7:12 AM, indicated LVN 3 gave Tylenol .2 tablet by mouth . (resident) REQUEST. On another entry, dated 9/8/2023 at 12:54 PM, LVN 3 gave Tylenol .2 tablet by mouth . (resident) REQUEST. Review of Resident 30's record titled Order Details, dated 9/8/2023, indicated an order was placed for an x-ray of Resident 30's right hip and leg at 5:09 PM. Review of Resident 30's record titled SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS, dated 9/8/2023 at 10:10 PM, x-ray results indicated there was an acute fracture of her right leg. During an interview on 11/15/2023 at 2:02 PM, LVN 3 stated she was an agency nurse, and she did not remember working with Resident 30 I don't remember patients like that, I work registry I see so many patients. I don't remember a patient like that. LVN 3 was asked what she would do if she had a resident who fell prior to her shift and was asking for pain medication. LVN 3 stated Give the pain medication and let the doctor know. During an interview on 11/17/2023 at 11:08 AM, LVN 4 stated she was working evening shift on 9/8/2023. LVN 4 stated when she went to check at the beginning of her shift, Resident 30 told her .she was in pain since last night . (Resident 30) did not want to get out of bed.(when LVN 4 tried to) move the right hip she screamed in pain and I called the doctor and (the doctor ordered an) x-ray. Normally .(Resident 30) never complains of any pain. During an interview on 11/15/2023 at 10:56 AM, the interim Director of Nursing (DON) was asked what her expectations of nursing staff were after a resident fell and was complaining of pain. The DON stated she expected staff to do a complete assessment and alert the doctor to see if more needs to be done such as an x-ray to rule out fracture. Review of Resident 30's record with the DON found no evidence day shift staff on 9/8/2023 thoroughly assessed Resident 30 or called the doctor on 9/7/2023 on day shift.

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post a current, daily nurse staffing Assignment Schedule, at each nurse station, for every shift, in a clear and readable format, in a prominent, visible, easily accessible location for residents, visitors, and others. This failure had the potential to cause residents, visitors, and others to have difficulty locating residents or their caregivers at any given time. Findings: During an observation on 11/13/23 at 10 AM, Nurse Staffing Assignment schedules were not displayed in either nurses station of the facility. The door into the room of the nurses station had a DO NOT ENTER sign on the door of both nurses stations. Residents and visitors were not permitted to enter nurses station to review the schedule. During an interview on 11/14/23, at 1:45 PM, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, inside the nurses station, provided a copy of nurse and CNA (Certified Nurse Assistants) schedule. LVN 1 stated the nurses and CNAs all help care for each resident and there are no nurse/CNA's assignment schedules for residents. Record review of the Assignment Schedule posted on the board in the nurses station with a DO NOT ENTER sign on the door of both units. The Assignment Schedule did not list in a clear and easily readable format which CNA/LVN was assigned to care for the resident. During an observation on 11/15/23, 11/16/23, and 11/17/23, between 9:30 AM and 11:30 AM, there was no Assignment schedule visibly posted in both nurse stations for residents or visitors to view. During an interview on 11/17/23, at 3:15 PM, Administrator stated she was unaware of posting requirement of Assignment schedules and would post schedules in a prominent place in each nurses station. Record review of the undated policy titled, Posting of CNA /Nurse Assignments Policy, Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to make Nurse and CNA staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents and visitors at any given time. Policy and Procedure: In order to assure easy access for both residents and visitors a chart with the CNA's assigned groups listed by room numbers will be posted outside of the chart rooms next to a dry erase board where the date and names of the nurses and CNA's and their respective assigned groups can be readily seen by all .

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1). label a refrigerated storage bag containing (64) house supply suppository medications with the correct expiration date. The storage bag of suppositories had an expiration date label of 9/22/23. The suppositories inside the storage bag had an expiration date of 2025. 2). Two Emergency Medication Kit boxes filled with injectable and oral medications had expired medications dated 7/2023 - 11/1/23. 3). Two refrigerated suppository medications had expired dates of 9/22/23 and 10/2023. 4). Three medical supplies had expired dates of 10/2020, 10/21/21, and 10/15/23. These failures had the potential to affect the quality of care and treatment of residents. Findings: In an observation of the medication storage room on 11/16/23, at 2:42 PM, accompanied by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, 1). a storage bag containing (64) house supply suppository medications was labeled with the expired date of 9/22/23. The house supply of suppository medications inside the storage bag had an expired date of 2025. During a consecutive interview, LVN 2 stated she would discard the storage bag and store the suppository medications, without a bag, in the refrigerator. 2). Expired oral medications in Emergency Kit Boxes: Lomotil (4) 2.5 - 0.025 milligram tabs expired on 10/1/23. Ativan (8) 0.5 milligram tabs expired 0n 10/1/23. Restoril (4) 7.5 milligram capsules expired 0n 11/2023. Expired injectable medications in Emergency Kit Boxes: Atropine (2) vials 1 milligram/milliliter expired on 11/2023. Epinephrine (2) ampoules 1 milligram/milliliter expired on 11/2023. Ertapenem (2) vials 1 milligram/milliliter expired on 7/2023. Furosemide (3) vials 20 milligrams/2 milliliter expired on 7/2023. Gentamycin (3) vials 80 milligrams/2 milliliter expired on 11/2023. Hydralazine (1) vial 20 milligrams/milliliter expired on 7/2023. Naloxone (1) vial 0.4 milligram/milliliter expired on 11/2023. Ondansetron (3) vials 4 milligram/2 milliliter expired on 7/2023. Sodium Chloride (1) vial bacteriostatic 30 milliliter 0.9% expired on 8/2023. Water for injection (1) vial bacteriostatic 30 milliliters expired on 11/1/23. 3). Expired refrigerated medications: Bisacodyl (6) suppository expired on 10/2023. Acetaminophen (1) 650 milligram suppository expired on 9/22/23. 4). Expired medical supplies: Brava Powder (13) (stoma powder), 1 ounce, expired on 11/30/20 to 10/15/23. Adapt (1o) packs (skin protected wipes) expired on 11/24/21 to 12/1/21. Adapt (1) (barrier rings) box of 10 expired on 10/2020. Record review of the facility policy, revised 8/2017, titled, Medication Disposal indicated, Policy: When medications are discontinued they shall be removed from the Unit by destruction. All expired medications and controlled substances shall be destroyed by two licensed nurses or by a nurse and pharmacist. Some expired medications maybe returned to the supplier before providing it to the resident. Notify the pharmacy to replace medications if expired. Purpose: 1. To ensure that discontinued medications, regardless of their route, do not remain either in the medication cart or the medication room .3. In the event of discovered discontinued or expired medications are left in medication room or cart immediately remove and call pharmacy to replace or destroy medication with two licensed nurses or by a nurse and pharmacist. Ensure medication was not given to resident and notify Nurse manager/Director of Nursing . 5. In the event of discovered discontinued or expired medications are left in medication room or cart immediately remove and call pharmacy to replace or destroy medication with two licensed nurses or by a nurse and pharmacist. Ensure medication was not given to resident and notify Nurse manager/Director of Nursing .

Based on observation and interview, three kitchen staff were not knowledgeable about the over the hood fire suppressant system. Failure to train kitchen staff upon hire and on a regular basis about all fire suppressant system in the kitchen did not ensure kitchen staff would be able to respond appropriately in the event of a fire within the kitchen. Findings: During initial kitchen observation and concurrent interview of the over the hood fire suppressant system (ANSUL) on 11/13/2023 at 09:34 AM, there was no obvious pull station to manually trigger the system in the event of a fire. Food Service Worker (FSW) 1, 2, and 3 were asked where the pull station was to activate the ANSUL system. All three kitchen staff were unable to identify where the pull station was. During an interview on 11/16/2023 at 1:20 PM, the Maintenance Tech (MT) stated he was responsible for staff fire training and fire drills. The MT stated he was aware of the ANSUL system in the kitchen and where the pull station was. The MT stated he was not aware if kitchen staff were trained regarding the ANSUL system upon hire and on a regular basis. These findings were discussed with the Administrator on 11/17/2023 at 8:15 AM. The Administrator was reminded that documented evidence of training regarding the ANSUL system was made upon discovery of these findings. The facility was unable to provide evidence kitchen staff were trained upon hire and on a regular basis regarding the ANSUL system.

Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards for food service safety to ensure safe food handling and storage when: 1. Staff personal belongings were stored in kitchen equipment storage room. 2. Temperature checks log were not completed for the dry storage areas on certain days. 3. Food items stored in kitchen past the use by date (date after which an item should not be used) This deficient practice had the potential to expose residents to food borne illnesses and to affect their appetite due to decreased potency and flavor of expired food items. Findings: 1. During an observation on [DATE], at 9:43 AM, in the kitchen, found staff personal jacket, backpack and hat, placed on top of a kitchen countertop where kitchen items such as trays and food containers were also stored. During an interview on [DATE], at 12:30 PM, with Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS), DSS stated, kitchen staff should store personal clothing and items in their locker room to prevent cross-contamination. 2. During an observation on [DATE], at 9:55 AM, in the kitchen dry storage room and concurrent record review of the dry storage temperature log, dated [DATE], temperature log indicated, temperature check was not entered on [DATE]- [DATE] and [DATE]-[DATE]. During an interview on [DATE], at 9:56 AM with Staff 4 , Staff 4 stated, kitchen staff should check the temperature of the dry storage and log in the form twice a day, morning and afternoon to ensure food safety. 3. During an observation on [DATE], at 9:46 AM, observed a white container containing opened bag of rice. The label on the container indicated, Product: Rice . Today's date: [DATE] . Good Thru: [DATE] . During an interview on [DATE], at 9:47 AM, with Staff 5, Staff 5 acknowledged the above findings and stated, rice should be tossed out. During a review of facility policy and procedure, titled Storage of Food and Supplies, revised [DATE], policy and procedure indicated, . All food, non-food items and supplies used in food preparation shall be stored in such a manner as to prevent contamination to maintain the safety and wholesomeness of the food for human consumption . Dry storage life of foods . Use manufacturer's expiration date for product storage. If there is no expiration date on the package, add the time listed below . Grain products . + 6 months .

Based on observation, interview and record review, resident's dignity and self-worth were not maintained and enhanced when one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 41) was assisted to eat lunch by a staff standing up next to his wheelchair. This failure may impact resident's quality of life. Findings: Resident 41 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . During a review of Resident 41's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 11/27/21, MDS indicated, Resident 41 has severely impaired cognition. MDS also indicated, Resident 41 required one-person limited-assistance (non-weight bearing support) with eating. During an observation on 12/14/21, at 12:10 PM, in dining room, Staff 1 was observed assisting a resident in a wheelchair. Staff 1 was observed spoonfeeding puree food and thickened-cranberry juice to Resident 41 while standing up next to the wheelchair. During an interview on 12/17/21, at 11:30 AM, with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated, staff should be eye-level with the resident they are assisting with eating. DON stated, we provided staff with stools to sit on during meal times. During a review of facility policy and procedure, titled Feeding a Resident, revised 8/2017, policy and procedure indicated, . Procedure . 3. Sit on the right side of Resident (unless you are left-handed then sit to Resident's left.) .

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered wound care plan for one of 12 sample residents (Resident 5). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 5 not receiving the care and services to meet his needs. Findings: Resident 5 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . During an observation on 12/14/21, at 11:30 AM, in Resident 5's room, observed Resident 5 with a dry dressing on her left lower leg. During a review of Resident 5's skin assessment, dated 12/11/21, skin assessment indicated, Resident 5 had an open area on left lower leg, measuring 1.8 x 1.5 centimeters (cm) with bloody discharge, oozing . During a review of Resident 5's care plan and concurrent interview on 12/17/21, at 10:31 AM, with Staff 2, there was no care plan to address Resident 5's left lower leg wound. Staff 2 acknowledged the findings. Staff 2 stated, the nurse who found the wound should have developed a comprehensive care plan as soon as possible. During a review of facility policy and procedure, titled Care Plan, revised 8/2017, policy and procedure indicated, . Purpose . to develop quantifiable objectives for the highest level of function the resident may be able to attain . Procedure . The comprehensive care plan includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the Resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs .

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services for one of 12 sampled residents, Resident 41, to maintain or improve his ability to eat independently. Failure to provide treatment and services is a potential harm risk for residents due to a decline in functioning which negatively impacts their quality of life. Findings: Resident 41 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . During a review of Resident 41's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 11/27/21, MDS indicated, Resident 41 has severely impaired cognition. MDS also indicated, Resident 41 required one-person limited-assistance (non-weight bearing support) with eating. During a review of Resident 41's Activities of Daily Living (or ADL, are tasks of everyday life) care plan, revised 10/22/21, ADL care plan indicated, Goal . I will maintain current level of function in ADLs through the review date . Interventions . Eating: I am able to hold cup/ feed self independently with supervision and set up . During an observation on 12/14/21, at 12:05 PM, in the dining room, observed Resident 41 sitting on a wheelchair. Staff 3 scooped and plated three (3) puree food items into a single bowl. Then Staff 3 gave this bowl to Resident 41. Resident 41 was able to feed self independently. Then at 12:10 PM, Staff 1 was spoonfeeding puree food and thickened-cranberry juice to Resident 41 while standing up next to the wheelchair. During an interview on 12/14/21, at 12:30 PM, with Staff 3, Staff 3 stated, Resident 41 used to have an adaptive plate (adaptive dining plates are designed to help users dine with minimal assistance) but it was broken because a staff accidentally put it inside a microwave oven about a month ago. Staff 3 stated, she has been using a regular bowl to serve Resident 41's meals since. During an interview on 12/14/21, at 12:35 PM, with Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), DSS stated, staff should report broken adaptive plates or any kitchen items used by resident so that facility could replace it right away. During a review of facility policy and procedure, titled Dining Room Service, revised 8/2017, policy and procedure indicated, Procedure . 6. Residents are encouraged to feed themselves as much as possible

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff competency when meals were not plated in accordance with physicians' order for one of five sampled residents (Resident 38). Failure to ensure standardized procedures may result in decreased nutritional intake leading to weight loss further compromising medical status of residents. Findings: During an observation on 12/14/21, at 12:01 PM , in the dining room, Resident 38 was waiting for her lunch to be served. Resident 38's lunch tray card indicated, regular diet - Mechanical soft-ground texture. During an observation on 12/14/21, at 12:04 PM Staff 4 was pushing a cart containing food items inside food containers. Then, Staff 4 asked Resident 38 if she likes turkey or pasta. Resident 38 responded, I like pasta. Then Staff 4 used a small black tong to pick pasta from the food container to Resident 38's plate. During a review of the weekly menu spreadsheet, titled Diet Extensions:Wednesday, Week 2, dated 12/8/21, weekly menu indicated, .General/Mechanical soft - ground . 6 oz (ounce, a unit of measurement) Penne Pasta with Meat sauce . During an interview on 12/14/21, at 12:05 PM, with Staff 4, Staff 4 stated, she is responsible for serving and plating food items to resident plates. Staff 4 stated, the green scoop is for vegetables and the gray scoop is for meat. Staff 3 was not able to demonstrate how to accurately control accurate portions of food based on the diet spreadsheet and Resident 38's diet order. During an interview on 12/14/21, at 12:15 PM, with Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS), DSS acknowledged the above findings. DSS stated, both dietary aides and certified nurse assistants serve food to residents. DSS stated, they will provide additional in-service to staff about how to use the spreadsheet and using the appropriate scoops to portion food. During a review of facility policy and procedure, titled Dining Room Service, revised 8/2017, policy and procedure indicated, .General Remarks . 2. Good food, attractively served, is important to the health of the Resident . a. Give medium sized portions when you serve food. It is better to give second servings than to ruin appetites by serving too much. Older people usually enjoy smaller feedings served often . The facility policy and procedure did not indicate how staff should accurately portion and serve food to residents including those on therapeutic diets.

Based on observation, interview and record review, for 16 of 16 sampled residents (Residents 27, 1, 36, 193, 6, 31, 30, 24, 3, 20, 18, 17, 41, 22, 13, and 7), the facility failed to: Obtain informed consent prior to the use of bed rails (rails attached to a bed); Review the risks and benefits on the use of bed rails with each resident or resident representative; Assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation; and Develop and implement policies and procedures on the use of bed rails. This deficient practice had the potential to put residents at risk for entrapment, fall, or injury. This deficient practice resulted in Substandard Quality of Care (SQC). Findings: - Review of the Resident Face Sheet for Resident 27, dated 3/21/19, indicated Resident 27 had [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. During a review of Resident 27's clinical record, the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 2/5/19, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief assessment for cognitive impairment) score of 10 indicating resident had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS also indicated Resident 27 required staff supervision and setup help with bed mobility and transfer. During an observation on 3/21/19 at 9:20 AM, the two upper bed rails of Resident 27's bed were raised. - During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1, the Resident Face Sheet dated 3/21/19, indicated Resident 1 had [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The MDS dated [DATE], indicated a BIMS, score of 9, indicating Resident 1 had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS also indicated Resident 1 required staff supervision and set-up with bed mobility, and staff supervision and one-person physical assist with transfer. During an observation and concurrent interview on 3/21/19 at 9:21 AM, the upper bed rails of Resident 1's bed were lowered. Resident 1 stated she used the bed rails for turning and repositioning when in bed. - During a review of Resident 36's clinical record, the Resident Face Sheet, dated 3/21/19 indicated Resident 36 had [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The MDS dated [DATE], indicated a BIMS score of 15, indicating resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident 36 required extensive assist and two-person physical assist with mobility and transfer. During an observation and concurrent interview on 3/21/19 at 9:33 AM, the two upper bed rails on Resident 36's bed were lowered. Resident 36 stated she depended on them (bed rails) for getting into and off the bed. - During a review of Resident 193's clinical record, the Resident Face Sheet dated 3/21/19, indicated Resident 193 had [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The MDS dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS score of 9 indicating Resident 193 had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS also indicated Resident 193 required extensive assist and two-person physical assist with mobility and transfer. During an observation and concurrent interview on 3/21/19 at 9:45 AM, the two upper bed rails on Resident 193's bed were raised. Resident 193 stated, It (bed rails) keeps me from falling out of bed. - During a review of the clinical record for Resident 6, the Resident Face Sheet, dated 3/21/19 indicated Resident 6 had [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The MDS, dated [DATE], indicated a BIMS score of 9 indicating Resident 6 had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS also indicated Resident 6 required extensive assist and two-person physical assist with mobility and transfer. During an observation and concurrent interview with Resident 6 on 3/21/19 at 9:48 AM, the two upper bed rails on Resident 6's bed were lowered. Resident 6 stated she used the bed rails when in bed to help with reposition and to keep her from falling off the bed at night. - During a review of the clinical record for Resident 31, the Resident Face Sheet, dated 3/21/19 indicated Resident 31 had [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The MDS dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS score of 15 indicating Resident 31 was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident 31 required supervision and set-up help with bed mobility and transfer. During an observation and concurrent interview with Resident 31 on 3/21/19 at 9:54 AM, the two upper bed rails of Resident 31's bed were lowered. Resident 31 stated he used one side of the bed rails for safety when transferring in and out of bed. - During a review of the clinical record for Resident 30, the Resident Face Sheet, dated 3/21/19, indicated Resident 30 had [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The MDS dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS score of 14 indicating Resident 30 was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident 30 required supervision and set-up help with bed mobility and transfer. During an observation and concurrent interview on 3/21/19 at 9:57 AM, the two upper bed rails of Resident 30's bed were lowered. Resident 30 stated the bed rails are up at night to help him move around and keep him from falling. - During a review of the clinical record for Resident 24, the Resident Face Sheet, dated 3/21/19 indicated Resident 24 had [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. to perform everyday activities). The MDS dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS score of 15 indicating Resident 24 was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident 24 required limited to extensive assistance and one-person physical assist with bed mobility and transfer. During an observation and concurrent interview with Resident 24, on 3/21/19 at 10:06 AM the two upper bed rails of Resident 24's bed were lowered. Resident 24 stated the staff forgot to put it up. He further stated he used the bed rails to grab on to during transfers. - During a review of the clinical record for Resident 3, the Resident Face Sheet, dated 3/21/19 indicated Resident 3 had [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The MDS dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS score of 15 indicating resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident 3 required supervision and one-person physical assist with bed mobility and transfer. During an observation on 3/21/19 at 10:10 AM, Resident 3 was sleeping, lying supine on the bed with the two upper bed rails raised. - During a review of the clinical record for Resident 20, the Resident Face Sheet, dated 3/21/19 indicated Resident 20 had [DIAGNOSES REDACTED].). The MDS dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS score of 11, indicating resident had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS also indicated Resident 20 required limited assistance and one-person physical assist with bed mobility and transfer. During an observation and concurrent interview on 3/21/19 at 10:18 AM, the two upper bed rails of Resident 20's bed were lowered. Resident 20 stated she used the bed rails for transfers to use her phone. - Resident 18 was admitted with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident 18 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) such as bed mobility and transfer. During an observation on 3/18/19, at 9:12 AM, Resident 18 was asleep in bed with the two upper bed rails raised. During an interview with Staff 10 on 3/18/19, at 9:12 AM, she stated Resident 18 used the bed rails when he is in bed for safety. During a review of Resident 18's clinical record and concurrent interview with Staff 4 on 3/19/19, Staff 4 stated she was unable to find the assessment, the consent, the physician order, and the care plan for the use of the bed rails. - Resident 17 was admitted with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. The MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident 17 was totally dependent on staff assistance with ADL's. During an observation on 3/18/19, at 9:20 AM, Resident 17 was lying asleep in bed and the two upper bed rails were raised. During an interview on 3/18/19, at 9:20 AM, Staff 10 stated the bed rails were used for the resident's safety. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 17 and concurrent interview with Staff 4 on 3/19/19, Staff 4 stated she was unable to find the assessment, the consent, the physician order, and the care plan for the use of the bed rails. - Resident 41 was admitted on [DATE], with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. Resident 41 required supervision and set-up assist with bed mobility and transfer. During the initial tour observation on 3/18/19 at 9:40 AM, Resident 41 was in her room sitting in her wheelchair, alert. The upper bed rails of her bed were raised. During an observation and concurrent interview with Resident 41 on 3/21/19, at 4 PM, Resident 41 was sitting in a wheelchair in her room, alert and pleasant. The upper bed rails of her bed were lowered. She stated her bed rails were up whenever she was in bed and she often held onto the bed rails when she needed to reposition herself. Resident 41 further stated nobody talked to her about the risk and benefits of having bed rails and Nobody asked for my consent to use the side (bed) rails. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 41, the MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 41 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. There was no documented evidence that a consent was obtained for the use of the bed rails. - Resident 22 was admitted on [DATE] with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 22, the MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident 22 had a BIMS score of 8 indicating Resident 22 had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS also indicated Resident 22 required extensive assistance and one-person physical assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and toilet use. During the initial tour observation on 3/18/19, at 10 AM, Resident 22 was asleep in bed with both the upper bed rails raised. During an observation on 3/21/19, at 4:25 PM, Resident 22 was asleep in bed with both the upper bed rails raised. During an interview with Staff 4, on 3/21/19, at 4:11 PM, she stated Resident 22's bed rails were always up whenever she was in bed. Staff 4 further stated Resident 22 was not capable of putting the bed rails down. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 22, there was no documented evidence an informed consent was obtained for the use of bed rails and an assessment for the risk of entrapment from bed rails was completed. - Resident 13 was admitted on [DATE], with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. During a review of the clinical record of Resident 13, the MDS dated [DATE], indicated, Resident 13 had a BIMS score of 12 (moderate cognitive impairment). The MDS also indicated Resident 13 required supervision and set-up support with bed mobility, transfer, and toilet use. During the initial tour observation on 3/18/19, at 10:10 AM, Resident 13 was in her room, sitting in a wheelchair, alert. The upper bed rails of Resident 13's bed were raised. During an observation and concurrent interview with Resident 13, on 3/21/19, at 4:25 PM, Resident 13 was in bed with the left upper bed rail raised. She stated her bed's left upper bed rail was always up whenever she was in bed. Resident 13 was unable to remember if the facility asked for her consent for the use of the bed rails, or if the facility talked to her about the risk and benefits of bed rails use. Resident 13 further stated she did not think she was able to put the bed rails down by herself. During a review of Resident 13's clinical record, there was no documented evidence an informed consent was obtained for the use of the bed rails. - Resident 7 was admitted on [DATE], with [DIAGNOSES REDACTED]. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 7, the MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident 7 had a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact). It also indicated Resident 7 required extensive assistance and two-person physical assist with bed mobility, transfer, toilet use and personal hygiene. During the initial tour observation on 3/18/19, at 10:15 AM, Resident 7 was sitting in his wheelchair, alert. Resident 7's bed had both the upper bed rails raised. During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 7, on 3/21/19, at 4:30 PM, Resident 7 was in his wheelchair, alert, and both the upper bed rails of his bed were raised. Resident 7 stated he was not aware that he used bed rails. During an interview with Staff 4, on 3/21/19, at 4:11 PM, she stated, the facility did not obtain informed consent for the use of bed rails because the bed rails were used by the residents as an enabler. During an interview with Staff 3 on 3/22/19, at 4:40 PM, Staff 3 verified and acknowledged that the facility did not assess the residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails and did not obtain informed consent and review the risk and benefits to the resident/resident representative for the use of bed rails. Review of the facility policy and procedure, titled, SIDERAILS, dated 9/2017, indicated, To use partial side (bed) rails as an enabler where a therapeutic intervention is warranted for medical symptoms or if the use of the rails are used to facilitate tactile discernment, safety, transfers or mobility. 3. Family is to be notified upon Physicians order as to the Plan of Care and the risk and benefits are explained . Review of facility policy and procedure, titled, INFORMED CONSENT, dated 9/2011, indicated, Each Resident has the right to receive in advance all information material to a decision to accept or refuse treatment . The facility will ensure these rights are not violated . The facility assists with obtaining documentation of verification of informed consent . On 3/25/19 at 1 PM, Staff 1, Staff 2, STAFF 12 and Staff 15 were notified of the substandard quality of care deficiency for failure to obtain informed consent and review the risk and benefits to the resident/resident representative for the use of bed (side) rails.

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its quality assessment and assurance plan to identify a systemic deficiency, and to develop an action plan when there was no policy and procedure that addressed the specific use of bed rails as enabler for 16 of 16 residents (See F700). Failure to develop a quality assurance plan, not identifying and prioritizing issues and implementing appropriate and necessary corrective actions, had the potential to compromise resident's safety, health and well-being that may lead to injury. Findings: During the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting on 3/25/19, at 1:10 PM, Staff 1, Staff 2, and Staff 3, verified and acknowledged that the facility did not assess the residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails, obtain informed consent and review the risk and benefits to the residents or residents' representative for the use of bed rails. Staff 1 stated they were not aware of the updated regulation regarding the use of bed rails until now. When asked how the facility received regulatory updates, Staff 1 stated through the All Facilities Letter which is received through the fax. Review of the facility policy and procedure, titled, SIDERAILS, dated 9/2017, indicated, To use partial side rails as an enabler where a therapeutic intervention is warranted for medical symptoms or if the use of the rails are used to facilitate tactile discernment, safety, transfers or mobility . No consent is required as this is used as enabler vs. a restraint. 1. The IDT (Inter-discilinary Team), the Primary Care Physician is to be notified and an order is to be obtained if it is to be used as a restraint for medical reasons. 3. Family is to be notified upon Physicians order as to the Plan of Care and the risk and benefits are explained . The facility policy and procedure did not reflect the recent changes to the regulation regarding bed rails. Review of the facility policy and procedure, titled, INFORMED CONSENT, dated 9/2011, indicated, Each Resident has the right to receive in advance all information material to a decision to accept or refuse treatment . The facility will ensure these rights are not violated . The facility assists with obtaining documentation of verification of informed consent .

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to established standardized recipes of the residents' Weekly Menu. This failure had the potential for residents not to meet their adequate nutritional needs. Findings: During food preparation observation and concurrent interview with Staff 15 on 3/20/19, at 9:45 AM, Staff 15 was slicing bell peppers and cooking in the kitchen without referencing to a standardized recipe of the Menu. Staff 15 verified the findings and stated, I'm cooking beef stew for lunch. Staff 15 stated there was no recipe to follow for the beef stew but he already knew the ingredients needed. Review of the facility's Weekly Menu for (MONTH) 17 - (MONTH) 23 posted in the kitchen, indicated beef stew, beef gravy, buttered egg noodle, seasonal vegetable, and ice cream were the food items to be served to residents for lunch on 3/20/19. During a concurrent interview and record review with Staff 8 on 3/20/19, at 10 AM, Staff 8 reviewed the recipe binder in the kitchen and was unable to find multiple recipes for the last week and current week's menu. Staff 8 verified and acknowledged the findings and stated following a standardized recipe was essential. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Standardized Recipes dated 12/2008, indicated, Standardized recipes shall be developed and used in the preparation of foods. Only tested standardized recipes will be used to prepare foods.

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored according to professional standards when an expired loaf of bread was stored in the kitchen refrigerator. This failure had the potential to result in food borne illnesses. During an initial tour observation of the kitchen and concurrent interview with Staff 16, on [DATE], at 9:20 AM, a loaf of bread with expiration date of [DATE] was stored in the walk-in refrigerator. Staff 16 verified and acknowledged the findings and stated it (loaf of bread) should be discarded. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled, Date Marking Procedure, dated [DATE], indicated, The policy (facility name) utilizes or discards all food products before the UB (use by date) stated by the manufacturer .

Based on dietetic services observation, dietary staff interview and dietary document review, the facility failed to ensure dietetic services were implemented in accordance with facility policy and acceptable standards of practice when storage of chemicals were directly adjacent to food items. This deficient practice had the potential to subject residents to food borne illnesses. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour observation on 4/17/18 at 9:56 AM, in the food production area, there was a box of pears and a box of watermelon stored directly beside a bucket of dishwashing detergent and a bucket of sanitizing solution. During an interview on 4/17/18 at 2:44 PM, when asked about storing food items adjacent to chemicals, the Certified Dietary Manager stated, When we're not doing food prep, it's ok to store them there. That's what we were told. Review of facility policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, revised on (MONTH) 2008, indicated, .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .15. Soaps, detergents, compounds or similar substances will be stored in separate storage areas from food storage.

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control and disease prevention practices when: 1. Unlabeled and unwrapped candy was stored in the medication cart in the Our Lady of Lourdes hall. 2. A sharps container adjacent to medication bottles was inside the medication cart in the Our Lady of Lourdes hall. Failure to implement infection prevention practices may result in cross-contamination of infection that could jeopardize the health of the residents. Findings: 1. During an inspection of the medication cart in the Our Lady of Lourdes hall and concurrent interview on 4/19/18 at 10:27 AM, there were two pieces of candy in a cup stored in the first drawer. One candy was wrapped but unlabeled and the other candy was unwrapped. The Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) acknowledged that one candy was unwrapped and threw the cup in the trash bin. LVN stated, It's candy for someone with a dry mouth. It's been there since I came. 2. During an inspection of the medication cart in the Our Lady of Lourdes hall on 4/19/18 at 10:27 AM, there was a sharps container filled with used syringes and lancets in the bottom drawer adjacent to bottles of medications. A sharps container was also attached on the side outside of the medication cart. During an interview on 4/19/18 at 1:24 PM, the Director of Nursing stated, The sharps container is dirty with the used insulin syringes and lancets. Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines indicated, .any item that could have come in contact with blood or body fluids should not be in the medication preparation area . (https://www.cdc.gov/injectionsafety/providers/provider_faqs_med-prep.html).

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow it's policy on Food Preparation and Service and failed to ensure foods stored in the refrigerators were labeled properly when: 1. Two buckets containing cleaning and sanitizing solutions were on top of the food preparation counter next to trays of raw pieces of chicken being prepared for lunch. 2. There were multiple food items stored in the refrigerator without the use by date, had use by date that had passed, and had no label. These deficient practices had the potential to expose residents for potential food borne illnesses. Findings: 1. During the Kitchen observation accompanied by the Dietary Manager (DM) on 4/12/17 at 9:50 am, the Kitchen Staff (KS) 1 was observed placing several raw pieces of chicken on the the trays located on the top counter of the preparation tale. There were two buckets of solutions next to the trays. In an interview on 4/12/17 at 9:52 am, the DM stated the one bucket contained cleaning solution and the other bucket contained sanitizing solution. In an interview on 4/12/17 at 9:53 am, the KS staff was asked why the two buckets were placed next to the trays of raw chickens. The KS 1 stated her English was no good. The DM repeated the question to the KS 1, who stated, they cant be placed together because food will be no good. In an interview on 4/13/17 at 1:52 pm, the DM stated it was for infection Control in order to prevent chemical food borne illnesses. Review of the facility policy: Food Preparation and Services, dated 12/10. Policy Statement: Food . shall prepare and . food in a manner that complies with safe handling practices. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: . 5. Food preparation will adhere to . and sanitary practices to prevent spread of food borne illnesses. 2. During the Initial Tour with the DM on 4/11/17 at 8:53 AM, the following were observed: - In the regular refrigerator were: a tray of mustard with use by date of 4/8/17, a jug of dill pickle with use by date of 3/6/17, a tray of fruits, yam and three trays of vegetables without use by date - In the bread and produce refrigerator were: a tray of cupcakes with no use by date, broccoli for soup and bacon with no label, peeled potatoes soaking in water in a clear container with no use by date - In the produce refrigerator was a bowl of raw beef with no use by date - In the dairy and beverage refrigerator were: a cube of yellow cheese and mozzarella cheese with no use by date, cream of wheat with no use by date During an interview on 4/11/17 at 9:30 AM, the DM stated the raw beef in the produce refrigerator should not have been there as that refrigerator was for produce only. During an interview on 4/11/17 at 9:45 AM, the DM stated staff should be labeling food items with use by date. She further stated she had just given the staff an in-service that included appropriate dating of food and their storage. A review of the Fall/Winter In-Service 2017 power point indicated the instructor was the DM. It also indicated on page 3, under Reheating and Storage of Residents Food, that food .Must have a received date and a use by date .