St Andrews Bay Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation
Panama City, Florida · CCN 105543
28 surveys since 2012, 11 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 114
- Surveys
- 28
- Harm or worse
- 11
- Immediate jeopardy
- 11
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 120
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER
- County
- Bay
- Medicare-certified since
- 1986
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=16, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Feb 24, 2026
258 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.61 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.22 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 46.0% | 44.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D981.8% | E218.2% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at St Andrews Bay Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF676Feb 24, 2026
Based upon observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) to maintain or improve abilities and choices for 5 out of 10 residents reviewed. (Resident #1, #6, #8, #9, #10)The findings include:On 2/23/26 at 10:15 AM, a tour of the facility was conducted. The following observations were made:Resident #6's room door was open and no privacy curtain was in use. The resident was lying in bed awake screaming I'm hurting. Resident #6 appeared unshaven and his hair was unkempt. He appeared to be restless moving in bed from side to side while rubbing his right and left lower legs. He did not have any clothes on except for an incontinence brief. He did not have any sheets or blankets over him. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF919Feb 24, 2026
Based upon observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure call lights were placed within reach of dependent residents while in their rooms for 12 out of 116 resident beds observed. (Rooms 115, 207, 208 (both A and B beds), 212, 213, 215, 302, 303, 308, 402, and 409)The findings include:A tour of the facility was conducted on 02/23/26 at 10:15 AM and revealed the following call light issues:In room [ROOM NUMBER], the call light was fastened with a red plastic clip hanging in between the bed and bedside dresser, out of reach of the resident lying in bed. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF690Sep 3, 2026
Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate and appropriate treatment and services related to the management of an indwelling urinary catheter to prevent urinary tract infection and hospitalization for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheter care (Resident #112).The findings included:During tours of the facility conducted on 09/01/2026 at 8:47 AM, 2:40 PM, and 4:13 PM, it was observed that Resident #112's urinary catheter drainage bag was dated 08/15/2026 (Photographic evidence obtained). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF732Sep 3, 2026
Based upon observations and interviews, the facility failed to post the daily staffing information in a manner that was readily available to staff, residents, and visitors for 3 out of 4 consecutive days.The findings include:An observation of the daily staffing data posted for public view was conducted on 08/31/2026 at 11:30 AM and again at 03:00 PM. The staffing data displayed was dated 08/30/2026, indicating that the information was not updated for the current day.On 09/01/2026, observations were conducted of the staffing data at 08:15 AM, 11:30 AM, 02:15 PM, and 04:30 PM. The information posted remained dated 08/31/2026, again reflecting failure to update the daily staffing posted.On 09/02/2026, observations were conducted of the posted staffing data at 08:00 AM and 11:00 AM. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF686Feb 24, 2026
Based upon interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care received ongoing monitoring and treatment for wound care to prevent worsening and new pressure ulcers from occurring, initiate treatment orders on admission, and monitor bruising to left lower abdomen, left groin and thigh that resulted in worsening of wounds and bruising. (Resident #1)The findings include:On 2/23/26 at 2:00 pm, an interview was conducted with Resident #1 who revealed upon admission on [DATE] that she did not have any wounds except on her sacral area but now she has a wound on her heel.A record review was conducted on 2/23/26 for Resident #1. […]
Read 31 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 31 of 114 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 3, 2026Standard2 findings
- Feb 24, 2026Complaint3 findings
- May 22, 2025Standard1 finding
- Feb 16, 2024Standard2 findings
- Nov 3, 2022Standard and complaint5 findings
- Aug 12, 2021Standard3 findings
- Feb 6, 2020Standard and complaint4 findings
- Jun 13, 2019Standard and complaint10 findings
Show the 20 earlier surveys
- Jan 11, 2019Complaint6 findings · 6 harm
- Aug 3, 2018Standard and complaint5 findings
- May 17, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Oct 6, 2017Standard and complaint11 findings
- Aug 12, 2016Standard3 findings
- Jul 27, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Feb 9, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Jul 30, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Jun 11, 2015Standard3 findings
- Dec 4, 2014Complaint2 findings
- Aug 15, 2014Standard6 findings
- Feb 7, 2014Standard9 findings
- Oct 17, 2013—2 findings
- Sep 26, 2013—3 findings
- Aug 22, 2013—1 finding
- Apr 5, 2013—8 findings
- Oct 3, 2012—1 finding
- Sep 14, 2012—11 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 7, 2012Complaint5 findings · 4 harm
- Jun 27, 2012—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Villa Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterDelandno harm findings
- Hawthorne Center for Rehab & Healing of SarasotaSarasota1 harm finding
- Susanna Wesley Health CenterHialeahno harm findings
- Blue Palms Health and Rehabilitation Center of DayDaytona Beachno harm findings
- Cypress VillageJacksonvilleno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction