Deficiency Index

Springbrook Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Clayton, North Carolina · CCN 345569

17 surveys since 2017, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
84
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
1
The record, 2017–2026
’17’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
100
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
PRINCIPLE LONG TERM CARE
County
Johnston
Medicare-certified since
2015

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 125 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in North Carolina.

Last survey on record

Apr 24, 2025

564 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.953.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.72—
Annual nurse turnover50.9%49.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$25,625 across 2 penalties
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ13.6%K—L—
Actual harmG13.6%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1864.3%E621.4%F13.6%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B13.6%C—
CMS’s current file: 28 of the 84 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6932×

    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Springbrook Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF760Feb 13, 2024

    Based on observations, record review and staff, Physician, and resident interviews the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when Nurse #1 administered Resident #63 medications prescribed to Resident #340 to include carvedilol (a medication classified as a beta blocker used to lower the heart rate and high blood pressure) 25 milligram (mg), losartan (a medication to treat high blood pressure) 25 mg, hydralazine (a medication to treat high blood pressure) 100 mg, and apixaban (a medication to thin the blood) 5 mg on 01/14/24. Resident #63 had previously received her own prescribed carvedilol 25 mg and losartan 100 mg that morning prior to receiving Resident #340's medication which resulted in duplicate medication. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Jun 5, 2024

    Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect a cognitively intact resident from verbal and physical abuse by a family member when Family Member #1 threw cold tea and water onto Resident #1, put her hands around Resident #1's throat, threatened to kill her and pushed Resident #1 onto the bed. This resulted in redness to Resident #1's neck. Resident #1 was sent to the Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation and returned the same day with a diagnosis of the strain of the neck muscle. Staff reported the resident appeared out of breath, nervous, and shocked following the incident. A reasonable person would have experienced feelings such as fear, anxiety, and humiliation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF814Feb 13, 2024

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a dumpster that was in good condition and free of leaks and to maintain the dumpster area free of debris for 1 of 1 dumpster. This practice had the potential to attract pests and rodents. Findings included: Observation of the facility's dumpster area on 2/07/24 at 1:30 PM with the Regional Nutrition Consultant revealed an area of a black substance around the dumpster which extended about 10 feet toward the road. This area of black substance had a strong odor of refuse. The area observed under the dumpster had approximately 3 inches of black debris which had a strong odor of refuse. The area behind the dumpster and the recycle container but inside the dumpster area fence had several items. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF802Aug 20, 2021

    Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to have sufficient dietary staff with competencies to carry out meal preparation and service for 79 of 79 residents who received meal trays. The findings included: This tag is cross-referenced to F 804. Based on interviews with residents (Resident #28, #290, #54, #68) and staff, review of grievances (Resident #45), resident council minutes and a test tray the facility failed to provide food that was at an appetizing temperature for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for food palatability. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF804Aug 20, 2021

    Based on interviews with residents (Resident #28, #290, #54, #68) and staff, review of grievances (Resident #45), resident council minutes and a test tray the facility failed to provide food that was at an appetizing temperature for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for food palatability. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The findings included: A grievance dated 3/20/21 by Resident #45's family member read; Breakfast tray was late, and meal was cold. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 84 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 30, 2026Standard4 findings
  • Apr 24, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 30, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 5, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 13, 2024Standard and complaint14 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 22, 2022Standard and complaint11 findings
  • May 12, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 22, 2021Complaint2 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Aug 20, 2021Standard and complaint18 findings
  • Mar 9, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 7, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 14, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 19, 2019Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Oct 19, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 22, 2019Standard and complaint13 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 12, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Jul 27, 2017Standard and complaint1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction