Deficiency Index

Sprenger Healthcare of Bluffton

Bluffton, South Carolina · CCN 425415

4 surveys since 2019, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
20
Surveys
4
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2019–2022
’19’20’22
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file3/4

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
60
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
SPRENGER HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS
County
Jasper
Medicare-certified since
2019

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=13, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Nov 19, 2022

1,451 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.584.05
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.75—
Annual nurse turnover62.5%52.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ120.0%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD240.0%E240.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 5 of the 20 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Sprenger Healthcare of Bluffton, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF880Nov 19, 2022

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, manufacturer's instructions, and facility policy review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: - Ensure multi-use glucometers were cleaned and disinfected after each use by 2 of 3 nurses observed during medication pass, which had the potential to affect 10 residents with orders for blood glucose monitoring. - Ensure proper hand hygiene and glove use when obtaining blood for glucose monitoring by 1 of 3 nurses observed during medication pass. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF760May 29, 2022

    Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to administer medications per physician order for [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Specifically, Resident (R)10 was administered [MEDICATION(S)] (a sleeping pill used to treat [CONDITION(S)]) 40 mg on [DATE] and [MEDICATION(S)] (medication used to treat low blood pressure) 5 mg x 4 tablets (20 mg) at bedtime on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE]. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for adverse outcomes due to being over medicated by staff. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF761Jul 30, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to double lock and secure Scheduled IV controlled medications in a permanently affixed compartment in two (2) of 2 medication rooms. The medication room refrigerator had no locking device to secure three (3) Lorazepam ([MEDICATION(S)]) syringes and thirty-five compound syringes of [MEDICATION(S)] (Lorazepam), [MEDICATION(S)], [MEDICATION(S)] (ABH) gel. Findings: The facility did not provide a Controlled Drug policy. On 7/29/21 at 8:49 a.m., observation of the Memory Care medication storage room refrigerator with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, revealed the medication room had a locked entry door. However, the refrigerator inside the medication room was unlocked. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 30, 2021

    Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to label and date food containers when opened, failed to close the food packages/boxes when opened, failed to air dry the steam table pans, failed to change gloves when touching food and failed to handle the plates and bowls in a sanitary manner. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled; Food Storage dated 2018 documented: 1.d. To ensure freshness, store opened and bulk items in tightly covered containers. All containers must be labeled and dated. 1.e. Store scoops covered in a protected area near the food containers. 3.e. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF759Nov 19, 2022

    Based on observations, record review, interviews, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have a medication error rate of 5% or less. The facility had 7 errors out of 28 observations for a medication error rate of 25%. This affected 3 out of 7 residents reviewed during the medication observation task. Findings included: 1. On 11/18/22 at 11:10 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility did not have a specific policy for insulin administration but stated they followed the medication administration policy. […]

Read all 20 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Nov 19, 2022Standard5 findings · 1 harm
  • May 29, 2022Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 30, 2021Standard5 findings
  • Jun 13, 2019Standard7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction